• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah yes, the US doesn’t glorify the “great man” like the founding fathers (who were a bunch of privileged land and slave owners), among others. The US has its elites and glorifies them just as much.

    You’re going to have to define “populist” because how you’re using it is so broad that it could apply to anyone. You are making a point based on opinion because you think all of Russia and all of China are monocultures. You’re reducing things down by so much as to make them meaningless. You’re also making bold claims like how you think only a single form of government is moral.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ask a progressive how they feel about Jefferson.

      Ask a progressive how they feel about Sanders.

      My point becomes clear very quickly.

      As for a populist, I am using the dictionary definition.

      a person, especially a politician, who strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups.

      This is core to the American zeitgeist and why populists do so well here. Obama coded as a populist in 2008, which is what made his campaign so successful, ultimately, but all of his policy messaging was non-populist. People just heard what they wanted to hear. That’s what makes him so unique in American politics