• usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a fun, well executed episode. It just happens to be one of those occasions where the Trek writers betray their complete misunderstanding of evolution.

      • Nico198X@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        oh yeah, maybe so. i think for me, as a kid, it was a tale that showed me we, ie humans, are more similar and have more in common than may appear to us at first glance. good lesson at that time.

        • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, it’s thematically appropriate for Star Trek, and a solid episode by just about every other metric. And Star Trek has never exactly been hard sci-fi, so I mostly don’t let it bother me.

          On the other hand, having lived through the “teach the controversy” nonsense, I do get just a little more bothered when they get evolution wrong than I do when they mess up something else.

    • teft@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Didn’t the founder lady say they were originally like the solids? Or am i misremembering?

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        They evolved from solid life forms, but it was never established what kind of life forms. Could be humanoid, could be a bacterium. It would make no scientific sense for something as complex as a humanoid to evolve into something so different. But it’s Star Trek, so anything is possible.

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    I want a hard reboot where there are no humanoid aliens at all.

    No Vulcans or Klingons; hell, no bipeds at all!

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      I remember reading about something that described this thought in a Star Wars fan site once. The stories that show human characters or human like characters everywhere, aren’t really human at all … they are more like place holders for exotic space alien beings that we can’t even imagine.

      I’d like to think that of Star Trek as well. The stories are just stories being shown for our convenience because the aliens they would encounter would be so strange and foreign to us that we wouldn’t be able to believe it, let alone understand it

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Then it wouldn’t be Star Trek, which is primarily a sci fi representation of human social conflicts with forehead stuff as a stand in for racial differences.

  • 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Honestly I’ve always hated this. An early example of the awful trend where there has to be a “lore reason” for every little detail.

    Star Trek aliens are mostly humanoids because its a human TV show telling stories that have to be relatable to humans and also has a limited budget. There is no need for a lore explanation.

    At least in this case it’s a one off that’s never really referenced again.

    • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I agree with you in premise, there is a general trend to over lore in modern sci-fi. Things can’t just be, they need some specific explanation.

      This though, I didn’t hate. It’s always bothered me that aliens in sci-fi are just humans with shit on their face, their cultures are just aspects of our culture turned to the extreme, and every species’ technology is around the same level.

      Having a progenitor species that seeded the galaxy and that’s why every intelligent species is basically the same is fine, basic but you know at least it makes sense and doesn’t need to come up again.

      Why are they the same, because a wizard did it essentially.

    • nomecks@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      If they were true to how the universe works then every species they encountered would be crabs.

  • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I haven’t seen discovery so no spoilers

    But it would be great if there was a bigger explanation that the general humanoid aliens were all seeded by the preservers while other more exotic spacefaring species evolved on their own hence the significant differences

    • PlasticExistence@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hard to say why specifically without spoilers, but I think you should at least try watching Discovery. It has some interesting ideas and is not altogether bad. I still like it the least out of all the series though. My issues with it are purely structural in nature (in short, too many things are rushed IMO).