Let me guess: this is, itself being used to calibrate AI models.
Oh for sure. If they’re not using the data themselves, they’re definitely selling it.
FUCK I fell for it 😢
Unlikely. They’re promoting their AI detection system.
Which is an AI trained on this data, likely.
Yes…? I’m not sure if you’re comment is pointing out a fact or an issue. What was your intent?
Not a fact, speculation, supporting the OC. Not an issue either.
Or a warehouse full of workers in India
Ah, the good ol’ mechanical Turk.
Then we should use one of the crappier AI models to sort through the images and feed this one more slop.
New band name: Recursive Slop
Hopefully not
The resolution of the photos is shit so it hides a lot of details that give away ai.
This is a pretty shitty test.
Is this 2 tone, outline-only image AI or digital art? Is this super overexposed picture of a poorly made plastic doll real, or AI?
The most noticeable thing about AI pictures is usually the composition because it’s so generic. If you get real pictures and try to make them look like AI then it’s really hard to tell the difference.
I took the October 2024 test. After reviewing 100 images, I scored 50% both on detecting both AI and non-AI images. Essentially a coin flip. I was much worse when I just tried to quickly go on intuition versus the times I spent some time to scrutinize the image.
I have a few visual impairments and often rely on other cues to perceive my world, but I still came in thinking I’d be able to do better than a coin flip. I find it scary how good these models are getting, especially the art sketches and landscape ones.
36% holy Batman, I am bad at detecting AI
holy batman lmao
That’s worse than a coin flip, so you actually have a negative correlation.
All you need to do is always go with the answer you think is wrong and boom, you get 64 %. 😅
There’s something about AI images that just gives it away. A certain glossiness. Subjects are usually too perfect. I find this is even more obvious out in the wild.
I have a theory that AI images in the wild will mostly continue this trend because the people making these images like it that way. Deceiving people is not the only reason people make images.
Does AI enable deception? Sure, but so does Photoshop, and that is decades old. Arguably, Photoshop requires more effort, but it seems like AI image generators still require effort on the part of the humans, if nothing else to select images that can fool, at the cost of other desirable features in images.
I got 40/50 an the 2024 February set, and 31/50 on the 2024 October set.
Fyi this is the new one.
I also got 72%.
80% on the old set and 76% on the new one
Would have gotten close to 100% if I used bit more effort and probably around 20% if I had just glanced at them
This tech is getting annoyingly good
I also got 76% on the new one. I got tricked a couple of times by plain pixelation. It can make background objects looks wrong.
