• staticlifetime@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know about that. IBM is traditionally stupid, yeah, but they wanted Red Hat for a reason. The CentOS debacle altogether was Red Hat, not IBM, and I don’t think they are doing too much day to day operational mandates for stuff like this. I would not be surprised if this was just a Red Hat thing. I know it’s easy to blame IBM, but I don’t think it’s that simple.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m absolutely not surprised that NASA took CentOS-in-more-than-name over the people who are trying to kill Enterprise Linux.

        • nan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      they wanted Red Hat for a reason.

      They were dying and they needed a cash cow to milk. The only way that was gonna work is if they didn’t kick the cow and spoil that milk like they’ve kicked every cow before it. And they can’t stop, so they’re just kicking away.

      • bishopolis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        if they didn’t kick the cow and spoil that milk like they’ve kicked every cow before it

        I miss Cringely’s take on this.

    • bishopolis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      . I would not be surprised if this was just a Red Hat thing.

      It’s a tough one. We blame RedHat for a lot of its half-baked internal fridge art - systemd, network manager; and even, some days, yum in an apt-4-rpm world.

      But this new one is QUITE the departure. It’s not ‘red hat’ stupid but a little further on the spectrum.