• Brkdncr
    link
    fedilink
    2410 months ago

    In one hand, voluntary unemployment funded by taxes seems unfair.

    On the other, fuck the man. The wealth imbalance needs to be fixed and this is a step in the correct direction.

    • @Kache@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      2010 months ago

      Unfair how? It’s paid by employers, so kinda makes sense to me, i.e. employer caused the loss of livelihood, so they pay for the benefit to the recently unemployed.

        • Matt
          link
          English
          29 months ago

          If you earn more money on unemployment when striking than by actually working, there is a serious problem with how work is valued.

    • alterforlett
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      I’m not in or from the US, but I’m guessing unemployment doesn’t pay enough to live the good life? Should just be enough to keep you alive?

      If you want to leave you shouldn’t worry about starving in the pursuit of better employment imo

        • alterforlett
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          Then I really don’t see the issue. Not like people would willingly put themselves in that kind of situation without a reason

      • Brkdncr
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Unemployment is not for when people decide to leave a job. It’s for when your employer lays you off. Going on strike is much different than being laid off.

    • @tintory@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      You would think? Shockingly nothing in this site talks about pro or anti choice. Mostly talks about anti austery, paid leave, yimby stuff, WFH, etc

    • wrath-sedan
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      This user always posts from that website. It seems primarily aimed at criticizing austerity measures but it’s super bizarre. No mention of who is actually putting this research together.

      Like I agree that austerity measures suck and that if you want a family you should be able to afford one, but phrasing it as “stop population decline” is just… weird? Like the examples aren’t bad exactly but the entire presentation and motivations behind the website sets off some serious red flags.

      • @tintory@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Saw it on Reddit and Google News, and ended up finding my self posting from it over and over