• MrGG@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Total tangent, but: the famous Stamets from Risa is also Canadian? 😀

        • MrGG@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh a Newfie! 😀 I’m in / from Toronto but my dad’s side of the family are all Acadian from Nova Scotia. (That’s not me being an ignorant Torontonian assuming NS and Newfoundland are the same thing, just acknowledging they’re both that side of Canada 😂)

          You’re being recognised for providing people with entertainment and joy. I’d say that’s a good thing! You’ve certainly provided me (and my friends by extension) with a ton of entertainment. To that point, if you message me your details I’ll e-transfer you $50 as thanks for all your good works.

            • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I like helping people laugh. The world sucks and if I can be part of the day being a little better then awesome.

              With this sentiment, you’ve already made my day a little better. That’s something that I also try for myself and it’s nice to see others expressing a similar view.

            • MrGG@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Neat! What area of Toronto are you in? Toronto must be so grey and bland and depressing for somebody coming from the east coast. I was born here and have been here all my life, and quite frankly I am really starting to hate it.

              Speaking of Star Trek, I re-watched TNG Relics last night and it bothers me so much that they didn’t really do much to investigate the origins of the Dyson Sphere. Quite possibly the most advanced piece of engineering in the galaxy ever (well, maybe excluding Iconian gates – they transport you to Toronto’s city hall, after all), and they’re just like “yeah, it’s uninhabited; anyway, Scotty’s sad”

              The world does indeed suck, so if sending a couple of bucks your way makes your day better then please let me – no pressure though! I would’ve offered to meet up and buy you a beer or two, but I don’t get out much anymore, nor do I drink often these days, so e-transfer is the next best thing for me.

                • MrGG@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Nice! I am west end / Parkdale-adjacent. I’ve been renting for a long time in this place, and it’s an older building, so the property management probably hate me and my rent-controlled ass.

                  I did actually play STO briefly in the early 2010s, but don’t think I encountered any stories involving the Dyson Sphere. It’s cool that they picked up on it in a quasi-canonical way. I do wish TNG returned to the sphere in the series run, though. I’m surprised Berman didn’t tackle it in an episode of Enterprise, although they would’ve made that a season long arc, and it would have turned out the sphere builders were actually the descendants of Porthos (who became enlightened and sentient beings after all of the space-cheese Porthos ate) who travelled into the distant past to build the sphere. Or it would end up being a Barclay holodeck simulation, one or the other.

                  Hey, whether Ripley’s or Hanlans there’s usually a lot of stuff to look at 😂

  • natarey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    1 year ago

    Always a great sign when your geopolitical neighbors quietly start planning for you to go full fascist.

  • muse@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hope that involves a plan for letting lgbt folks immigrate to safety instead of apologizing 80 years later like they did to the casualties of Nazi Germany who were denied safe passage

    • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve heard Canadians claiming they’re already letting LGBT folks from the US achieve refugee status, but that’s strange because Canada has a treaty with the US explicitly stating that they can’t take in refugees arriving from the US. So it seems like Canadian citizens think they’re taking in LGBT refugees from the US, and will likely be confused and push back when people try to tell them that Canada literally can’t take US refugees without the refugee doing a big, long legal song and dance. So my guess is that the Canada is going to claim they’re already doing it (when they don’t actually seem to) and then apologize again in 80yrs.

      Edit: y’all wanna tell me how I’m wrong? As someone who’s head will probably be on the chopping block should republicans win the next election, I would really like to know if I can count on Canada not turning me around should I find myself having to show up at the border with my belongings.

      • angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would love to say that I have hope that Canada will be willing to break that treaty, but Canada is still financially dependent on the US, not to mention that people who care a lot about “muh Canadian identity” would definitely be against taking Americans.

        Honestly I think secessionism has more of a chance than Americans being let into Canada.

        • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          not to mention that people who care a lot about “muh Canadian identity” would definitely be against taking Americans.

          I know someone who’s non-binary that’s moved to Canada (I think it was on a work visa), and they’ve talked about how Canada has been very welcoming to them in regards to their gender. However, they’ve also said that they’re very glad that their coworkers have either forgotten, or aren’t aware that they’re American because they’ve heard nothing but hate and vitriol towards Americans. No sympathy towards LGBT Americans, no sympathy towards BIPOC Americans, just generally “fuck Americans, they deserve everything that’s happening to them”.

          That wasn’t something I was expecting to hear, and it seriously hurt my view of Canada and my hopes that Canada might act as a safe harbor towards LGBT and BIPOC Americans in the future (assuming republicans succeed with Project 2025).

        • Yeah, it’d be nice if I could do that. Sadly I’m not in a position to at the moment. My understanding of the whole situation is that Canada allows asylum seekers from the US, who have to go through a long, drawn-out legal process that involves having a politician personally vouch for them. Refugees, however, are automatically turned away from Canada if they come from or through the US as the US is still considered “safe harbor” for refugees of all kinds.

          What’s the difference between an asylum seeker and a refugee? While asylum seekers and refugees are both fleeing their countries, personally I see asylum seekers as people with options, typically with highly desirable skills or knowledge, allowing them to choose which country to make their new home in. Refugees, on the other hand, show up at the border with the clothes on their backs and whatever they could cram into their backpack or car, because they don’t have anywhere else to go.

      • Petri3136@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Canada won’t be as eager to take US refugees as you hope. I can’t think of a small population dealing with massive refugee inflows from a place that much larger. Think of how destabilising the refugee migrations from Syria were on Europe. Lots of LGBT and sympathetic cases of course but lots of crazy and the amount of entitlement would be overwhelming.

        The rest of the industrialised worried will have angry Americans in their faces screaming about their first and second amendment rights every day if there is an exodus.

  • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve already checked. I’ve got enough qualifications that I can just migrate to Canada.

    It’ll be nice to teach them about what their summers are going to be like.

      • ikiru@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t need to elect anything. Fascism is inherently militaristic.

        If the US goes full fascist, then it’s only a matter of time.

        No place in the world will be safe.

        • Ertebolle@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          He supports Ukraine, climate change targets, new housing construction, abortion rights, immigration, legal weed, and gay marriage. He has plenty of other extremely problematic positions and I hope he loses badly, but nevertheless, the gap between him and basically any Republican is pretty substantial.

          • Conowelle@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            He’s voted against abortion rights, he’s voted against gay marriage, he’s lukewarm about legal weed but tbf prob wont illegalize it, and his solution to climate change is producing more oil.

            • Ertebolle@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wikipedia:

              In 2020, he changed his position and said that a government led by him would never introduce a bill on the topic, and no private ones would be adopted. In 2021, Poilievre opposed a private member bill prohibiting sex-selective abortion.

              Poilievre supports same-sex marriage; in a 2020 interview, he called it a “success” and stated “I voted against it 15 years ago. But I learned a lot”.

              And yeah, he wants to produce more oil, but so does Biden. And for that matter, Trudeau also wants to build more oil pipelines. I wish there were more mainstream politicians who were genuinely anti-fossil-fuel but those are, unfortunately, few and far between.

              • Conowelle@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago
                1. Wikipedia is not a reliable source
                2. They keep voting to infringe on that right as recently as this year https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/03/canada-abortion-rights-pregnancy
                3. Ya I don’t think that Pollievre would restrict access to gay marriage, but if he voted against it with his gay father in attendance, if that isn’t a sign of a piece of shit I don’t know what is. ( he also is courting the voters and MP’s that do want to restrict it)
                4. Then vote for Singh and the NDP as he’s the only Federal Leader that kind of has a chance to become PM, that opposes oil, and at least the Trudeau government is talking about removing oil subsidies.
          • Electricorchestra@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly the most daming thing about PP is that he’s been in goverance since he finished uni, never held a real job in his life. Also I’m 100% sure he’s never made a woman cum.

      • Powerpoint@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Two years still. Lots can change and people will see through the piss poor attempt at the Conservative rebranding of Poilievre.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          People the world over have been remarkably bad at seeing through cheap far-right populist pandering. I don’t trust the electorate.

      • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        We basically flip between Liberal and Conservative on schedule. Trudeau took a gamble on positive numbers calling the last election early but I think his brand is essentially dead. PP is getting a huge image treatment right now if you’ve seen his tanned face and new persona, like they’re throwing full weight in to making him relatable, and you can tell what a massive effort that is lol. I don’t see too much of a material difference between LPC and CPC though, CPC is more shameless but the things LPC does to sovereign nations inside our country should be setting off more alarm bells than they are. People forget those treaties are with the Crown not the Canadian government. Also fuck the Liberals for not changing the vote, they campaigned so hard on that and I can’t believe I fell for it first time around. NDP are polling decently well too but with the voting being what it is they’re screwed. Although I’m not a huge fan of Jagmeet and how he became leader and think NDP need to do better with their branding and messaging, right now it’s like “we’re liberals but more authentic” but they need to be more forthcoming with the economic vision and why it will benefit everyone regardless of their identity. A straight white tradesman needs to get the message that he has just as much interest in voting NDP as a nonconforming individual, and I think they really need to tie these messages back to the economic benefit and power of having solidarity with others in achieving material political goals.

        • Mudface@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Great summary, and good insight imo

          A lot of NDP voters where I am at, but PP is going to get my vote. Cost of living is my #1 voting issue and Pierre is the only one I’ve even heard talking about it.

          NDP and Liberals just don’t care about how much money I have left in my pockets at the end of the month, they think it’s all theirs anyways

          • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            On housing PP wants to “remove beurocracy” for developers which means they can build what will maximize their profits with less regard for regulations, and with the huge demand for housing this allows them to cater to mid-upper range of home buyers and cut corners. Milton and north Oakille are good case studies for this strategy where it’s basically all dual-income managerial workers and white collar professionals living in blocked out subdivisions with cheaply made “luxury” homes.

            Liberals just pulled their move today by waiving GST for rental unit developers but as usual it’s a pandering half-measure.

            NDP share the tax GHT/HST waiving for renters in their housing policy on top of using under-utilized federal land to build social and co-op housing right away, as well as forcing developers to build affordable housing with the communities and municipalities having more say. They also want to extend CMHC insured mortgages for first-time buyers to 30 years so people’s monthly payments would be less. Although I think the down payment is the hurdle for most.

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ll tell you a secret nothing he does well influence it. Sure cost might godown but won’t be because of any one running the country. If the president doesn’t matter for the Is economy I would assume it’s the same for us.

  • millie@lemmy.film
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m both curious and personally invested on what their outlook on refugees would look like. I’ve definitely considered the possibility of having to flee to Canada as a trans woman, but I guess the question is how legitimately I’d be able to enter the country and whether I’d have to go into hiding once I get there.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right now, yeah a trans person can seek asylum in Canada. But the leader of the Conservative Party is a culture war fashy type not too dissimilar from Ron Desantis. If he gets in, it’ll be dark days north of the border too.

    • PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the US goes, Canada will too. I forsee Quebec and New England allying against the plains provinces/states.

            • n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Psst, I live in Onterrible, I don’t want any association with Alberta. I know exactly how stupid people are there.

              Half the people I talked to said they would vote Trudeau if he legalized marijuana even though the NDP were campaigning for DECRIMINALIZATION. Bunch of retards (plz be offended) out there

  • dangblingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m genuinely confused as to why, knowing that the Conservative/Republican brand has always been to serve big business, deregulating while also lowering taxes for the wealthy while cutting services to working class families, why people en masse would vote for them.

    I get it, 2 sides of the same coin and all that jazz, but one side of the coin is just greedy, while the other side of the coin is greedy and is actively stoking the fires of a civil war.

      • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not that they believe welfare is immoral. They believe welfare that comes without the Jesus Strings attached (i.e., welfare from the state) undermines their ability to market Jesus by giving fully Jesus-encumbered welfare to the hard up.

      • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most of them don’t really believe that. In fact I’m pretty sure most of them don’t actually have many beliefs other than “if i just moving goalposts fast enough, I’ll never have to form a new opinion on anything.”

        It doesn’t matter who did what so long as their side is right.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ironically, the other half of their brand is actively screwing with interests of big business. Big businesses also want stability and predictable government fiscal behavior, and republicans are now famous for throwing tantrums and threatening to screw up borrowing and repayment if they don’t get their ways on issues that businesses flat out don’t care about.

  • Powerpoint@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    We need electoral reform to avoid the same in Canada. The official opposition is actively siding with fascists.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And just like the Democrats in the USA, the Liberals don’t seem to recognize the danger. The middle of the road will never save us from the far right.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t blame them. As an American I’m mulling the same.

    I just hope their plan includes an asylum path for Americans sick of this doubling-down on ignorance. Not to say Canada isn’t without their dumb dumbs either…

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We’ve got our dumb-dumbs, and they’re definitely importing some culture war bullshit from you guys, but the party they fall in behind (Progressive Conservatives) is closer to democrats than the republicans, in general.

      • Navy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        You should take another look at what the CPC is focusing on. At their convention this month they voted on what to focus on as a party; two anti-trans policies passed the policy for affordable housing did not. Is the CPC as far right as the US Republican party, no they’re not, but Poilievre is happy to court people who are. Also he won’t answer non-vetted questions which is a different issue but still rubs me the wrong way.

        • atp2112@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          And more horrifyingly: polling might not mean much this far out, but right now, the CPC is leading. Big. Skippy is terrifying, and terrifyingly close to power.

          • TwoGems@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Only you guys can help your democracy internally. Never fail to vote, get your friends voting and obviously never vote for conservatives.

  • Ertebolle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not all that worried about authoritarianism in America, for this reason: America is a big country full of lazy, entitled fucks who hate their jobs. And our police are the most lazy / entitled / job-hating of them all.

    You are never, ever going to get the number of dedicated spies / censors / secret police you would need to pull off authoritarianism in America; they’ll absolutely cut taxes and cut social services, fuck up the economy seven ways to Sunday, and let overseas strongmen run roughshod over smaller countries, but that’s what they’re about. Even on the limited occasions where Americans do dabble in policing thoughtcrime - the recent spate of book censorship for example - it’s half-assed and sloppy and only ever meant as a means to some other end (in the case of book bans, destroying public schools), never something people are actually that excited about in its own right.

    So yes, we certainly have to worry about Republicans winning things because they’re going to make everybody’s lives miserable in a hundred different ways if they do, but authoritarianism is beyond their power to pull off.