• DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Unfortunately police reform doesn’t necessarily imply taking police funds and diverting them to nonviolent responders instead. It’s hard to make that into a catchy phrase that can’t be misinterpreted. I could see cities implementing some rubber-stamp oversight board filled with ex-cops and saying, “see, we reformed the police! They have oversight now.”

    • markr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      just about every police reform has failed to provide any independent oversight, failed to address the core problems, and generally just poured more money into the already bloated and militarized police force.

    • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like “unburden the police”. Take away things that aren’t actual policing. Cops don’t need to be out there doing animal control for example.

      • PickTheStick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        For better or worse, that aspect is never going away. Places with less funds, like rural counties and cities, rely on their police to do everything that gets called in to 911 and isn’t fire/ems/construction (which, thankfully, they have dedicated teams/people for).