What’s the definition of insanity? Seriously, just give Quebec their team. They’ve suffered long enough.

  • Apollonius_Cone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think what is called for here is a reference to Swamp Castle. Listen, lad. I built this kingdom up from nothing. When I started here, all there was was swamp. Other kings said I was daft to build a castle on a swamp, but I built it all the same, just to show 'em. It sank into the swamp. So, I built a second one. That sank into the swamp. So, I built a third one. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp, but the fourth one… stayed up! And that’s what you’re gonna get, lad: the strongest castle in these islands. When it comes to hockey, Atlanta is Swamp Castle.

    • egerlach@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least last time the Thrashers became the Jets. Maybe this time the new Atlanta team will become the Nordiques again or an Atlantic Canada team.

      • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Atlantic Canada and the Maritimes refer to the same thing right? I’m not from there so I get the terms confused, but I hope to see a Nova Scotia/New Brunswick/ P.E.I. team eventually.

        • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maritimes is New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and PEI. Atlantic brings in Newfoundland and Labrador.

          It’s kind of the same thing as the Prairies for Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta vs the West which adds BC.

  • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Surely it would be better to put teams in more passionate hockey areas? Seattle made sense but Atlanta really seems like football country. Quebec, Hamilton or the Maritimes seem better and more interesting to me, especially Quebec or the Maritimes. I’m sure I read a study about how Canada could support far more teams despite their smaller population due to the higher proportion of hockey fans.

    • pbjamm@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Moving the NHLs most forgettable team (Coyotes) to Regina would make more sense than another attempt to make hockey relevant in Georgia.

        • charles@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Or it’s just not as big of a hockey market as many other cities. I completely understand why Bettman is against additional Canadian teams (even if I disagree with him) but is Atlanta really the best we can do?

          • SatouKazuma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d personally love to see Houston get a team, but I think the League would put a team in Honolulu before they get to Houston.

            • Dandroid@dandroid.appM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not sure Houston would be much better than Atlanta. I live in Austin, and when I ask people if they watch the Dallas Stars, they ask if I mean the Dallas Cowboys. When I explain that the Stars are a hockey team, they look at me puzzled for a second and say, “Dallas has a hockey team?” What’s worse is when I explain that we have a hockey team (albeit a minor league team), they are just as shocked.