The European Union has recently reached an agreement on a significant competition reform known as the Digital Markets Act (DMA), which will impose strict rules on large tech companies that will have to offer users the ability to communicate with each other using different apps. WhatsApp is one of the companies that will be required to comply with the new regulations outlined in the European Union’s Digital Markets Act. This is because WhatsApp is considered a gatekeeper service since it’s a large tech platform with a substantial user base and falls within the criteria set by the DMA. With the latest WhatsApp beta for Android 2.23.19.8 update, which is available on the Google Play Store, we discovered that WhatsApp is working on complying with the new regulations:

As you can see in this screenshot, WhatsApp is working on a new section dedicated to the new regulations. Since it is still in development, this section is still not ready, it appears empty and it’s not accessible to users, but its title confirms to us that they are now working on it. WhatsApp has a 6-month period to align the app with the new European regulations to provide its interoperability service in the European Union. At the moment, it remains unclear whether this feature will also eventually extend to countries beyond the European Union.

Interoperability will allow other people to contact users on WhatsApp even if they don’t have a WhatsApp account. For example, someone from the Signal app could send a message to a WhatsApp user, even without a WhatsApp account. While this broader network can definitely enhance communication with those people who use different messaging apps and assist those small apps in competing within the messaging app industry, we acknowledge that this approach may also raise important considerations about end-to-end encryption when receiving a message from users who don’t use WhatsApp. In this context, as this feature is still in its early stages of development, detailed technical information about this process on WhatsApp as a gatekeeper is currently very limited, but we can confirm that end-to-end encryption will have to be preserved in interoperable messaging systems. In addition, as mentioned in Article 7 of the regulations, it appears that users may have the option to opt out when it will be available in the future.

Third-party chat support is under development and it will be available in a future update of the app. As always, we will share a new article when we have further information regarding this feature.

    • moon_matter@kbin.social
      23·
      1 year ago

      It’s still a win if the move causes widespread adoption by the average consumer. The more privacy conscious can just use a different client.

      • sorghum@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        5·
        1 year ago

        It’s not a win in my book. If Whatsapp can send messenges to me on my signal app, I’ll need a feature in signal to block incoming messages from Whatsapp clients. Otherwise, Meta would still have access to the whole conversation without my permission and that’s a big problem.

        • kugel7c@feddit.deEnglish
          3·
          1 year ago

          This is a pointless way to think about it, as long as signal can block conversations, or as long as you can just not respond, noone can gather your data. Only if you reply they might get some of your data, the message that you sent fully knowing that the one you were sending it to could leak it just as well as Facebook. So what does it matter if they can send you messages.

    • Virkkunen@kbin.social
      20·
      1 year ago

      This will probably work like Matrix already does, you’re not linking anything to a service. They’re just demanding that every messaging app use the same protocol (and encryption) instead of different ones.

    • volodymyr@lemmy.worldEnglish
      15·
      1 year ago

      You still, presumably, use HTTP for your internet needs, even though facebook totally works over it.

      What’s the problem with a protocol for chat?

        • volodymyr@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          They certainly do. They undermine HTTP too. And would have done much more harm if the Web was not founded with a different governance model.

          EU actions like that in the title post stress this original, less centralized, model. It was naive to assume that free internet will remain free if left alone.

          Paradoxically, preserving freedom relies on constraints and regulations.