• throw4w4y5@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    this was always the plan, since minorities and disabled citizens in the UK tend not to vote conservative.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meanwhile Labour plan to give people with Settled Status the vote, who they probably expect to vote for them. This cherry picking of the electorate isn’t going to benefit anyone.

      • Shalakushka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, disenfranchising people is exactly the same as enfranchising people, your big centrist brain has it all figured out

        • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well, no. By changing the voter base you’re just avoiding actual productive competition. Why should a party bother doing actual work for its voters to earn their votes , when they can just parachute in a ton of people that will vote for them no matter what?

          • Shalakushka@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh no, my democracy is going to represent the people rather than an arbitrary subset of the people that happen to align with my biases! The horror!

            Democracies should have strong, broad participation. Why would you want a democracy that hears the voice of fewer of its constituents, other than to do things they would never accept given the choice?

            You think any change to the voter base is negative for some reason - it’s not. Some changes make the democracy less representative of the people living in it (e.g., arbitrarily deciding some people shouldn’t be able to vote) while some make the democracy more representative (e.g., removing arbitrary barriers to voting).

            • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Oh no, my democracy is going to represent the people rather than an arbitrary subset of the people

              Fair point

              It just surprised me a bit that Labour have come up with this now, after Brexit, so I’m trying to read between the lines and see what motives they might have to do it. As much as I support Labour and broadening the voter base, I fear the ulterior motive here is to defend themselves from competition. If they actually wanted productive, democratic competition, they would adopt PR.

              happen to align with my biases!

              Please don’t assume my biases. It’s not a good look.

              • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Brexit supporters claimed brexit would open the nation to more wide skilled immigration rather then be a racist attempt to stop it.

                So of course that wanted immigration will lead to a community that needs a say in how the nation is run.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why shouldn’t they be able to vote?

        They live here. They work here. They pay taxes. They’re allowed to stay indefinitely. They’ve made this country their home.

            • ilikekeyboards@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you spent any second around tories you’d quickly learn that English white is the best white they just don’t say it out loud

              • Blackmist@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                What I noticed around the referendum was that a lot of Brits seem to think Romanians are all gypsies, confusing them with the Romani.

                If they’d bothered to speak to any Romanians, they’d have discovered they have quite a bit in common, as the Romanians seem to hate the Romani even more than we do…