Over three-fourths of Americans think there should be a maximum age limit for elected officials, according to a CBS News/YouGov survey.

  • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Definitely. Age limits are difficult. Some people lose it early. Some never do.

    Two terms and you’re out seems to me to mostly resolve this.

    You can even make it just two consecutive terms. I think I’m largely fine with that. At least it’s better than the alternative.

    Also, lifetime appointment. That was designed at a different time. Scotus should be a (reasonably long) single term. Then you’re done with the federal judicial system.

      • greenskye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        10 years is nice to because it wouldn’t line up exactly with new presidents, so it would guarantee different parties would most likely get to pick.

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In 1789, the average lifespan for a Supreme Court justice was 67 years. By 1975, that expectancy had risen to 82 years.

    • Alex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just let agelimits apply to judges as well and make judges appoint judges while you’re at it to minimize the politicizing of the bench.

    • Impassionata@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Age limits are difficult.

      They’re not that hard, and they’re simple and direct, and we already use them. Don’t overcomplicate it.