• TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then they should take the ship, and give back the oil. This isn’t about law, it’s about power and control. And it should be considered wrong by any decent, civilized person.

      • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you are being unreasonable in that argument. It’s not like they have the oil in cargo containers and can transfer it from one ship to another outside of port. The oil IS the ship.

        Sure they could dump it in the ocean? Which would be the dumbest of all options.

        Or they could seize the ships, and tow them back to port. Which looks like the options they took.

          • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            So now I have to prove my geopolitical stance on an engineering and logistics problem?

            I can only give the facts, what people do with the politics is their own prerogative.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The logistics are pedantic. They took the ships under civil forfeiture. Made the company pay to transport the oil to Houston. Took the oil and sold it. They could have left the oil. Arrested the captain and crew. And fined the company. They stole it for… reasons.

      • Franzia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is about power and control. We are uaing sanctions on Iran and many officials in Iran as leverage for the nuclear deal as well as other human rights violations. And this company fucked up real bad, otherwise we would have let them do it. So much oil gets sold in Iran, blended in Malaysia, and sold to China at a reduced price for accepting the contraband oil.

          • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            US sanctions on Iran are resulting in harm to the country’s environment and preventing everyone there - including migrants and Afghan refugees - from fully enjoying their rights to health and life, and contributing to other factors such as rising air pollution

          • Franzia
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Iran is violating the human rights of all living there. Do you have such a weak memory? And while they do that they want to build nukes? Fucks sake.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The sanctions are exacerbating the human rights issues. It’s in the article. From the United Nations.

              • Franzia
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                This article is compelling, and I’m a bit torn. I didn’t realize Iran has had these sanctions since 1979. I should know that, I paid attention in hiatory class. When the sanctions are framed on a shorter time scale, the JCPOA in 2018 and sanctioning of officials in 2022… those make more sense. But this 40+ year long policy was not a good choice. I imagine the Iranian people will just suffer for the rest of my lifetime unless we shift methods.