NASA finally admits what everyone already knows: SLS is unaffordable::“At current cost levels the SLS program is unsustainable.”

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can I ask: do you actually believe NASA builds their own rockets themselves? Like out back in their shed with a table saw and pliers?

      The prime contractor on the sls is boeing.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just hate for musk, people who hate musk have blinders on and think every company he has any input into is a scam.

          • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            SpaceX is a tool that directly aids democracy. Without it, we still wouldn’t have independent access to space. We would be relying on the Russian Soyuz to carry us to the ISS, and due to the current situation, I don’t think they’d have let us continue riding the Soyuz if we didn’t have our own method.

              • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                The ISS is an important international partnership with allies and rivals alike that strengthens the US’ position on the world stage. That the US is capable of maintaining such a complex system is an example of democracy’s value and the US’ soft power.

            • topinambour_rex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              SpaceX existed before Musk bought it. It could have ended being used by the NASA. Then you seem to forget the ESA and their Ariane launchers.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, I hate musk as much as the rest of them. SpaceX is the only company he has that’s worth a damn. I was really kind of happy when he started screwing with Twitter because he has less time to screw up SpaceX.

          Now, that said, SpaceX needs competition. I will take us for musk to have one bad trip hop in there and start screwing that company over. If NASA is fully dependent on them…

          SpaceX isn’t doing anything another company can’t do. It’s just that Boeing owns our f****** government.

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Starlink is horrible on many fronts. Just the amount of trash they’ve thrown into low orbit is crap. Short-term disposable satellites are not great. Now he’s taking and giving access based on his own political wants.

              Tesla’s a pretty mixed bag. Privacy issues, quality issues, resell issues, repair issues, self-driving car failures. All the other stuff they do really well everybody else also does well.

              All this stuff started off really strong when he started going batshit crazy things started getting less attractive

            • SMillerNL@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Tesla is publicly traded and as far as I can tell Starlink is not a company but rather a SpaceX project.

    • weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If NASA cancelled every single contact they had with SpaceX… they might be able to afford 1/3rd of an SLS launch. Or maybe not, because then they’d have to start paying Russians for rides up to the ISS.

      SpaceX is saving NASA boatloads of money. Which Congress is forcing them to waste on SLS.

    • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      SpaceX is getting 2-3 bn dollars for Starship HLS development, most of the funding is coming from SpaceX itself. SLS costs up to 4 bn per flight. I’m not even going to mention the insane cost-overruns and years of delays associated with NASA’s cost-plus contract with Boeing to build the damn thing.

      SLS is a sunk cost fallacy and jobs program.

    • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even then, commercial launch providers get much further with less money. Sure, if NASA had more budget, they could afford the SLS program. But the commercial launch providers show that they could be more efficient with the money they do have.

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would destroy US space capabilities. Just because Elon is a racist dipshit doesn’t mean we should stop building the best rockets in the world.

      Honestly if we have less money to Boeing and more to spacex, NASA would be way better off.