Why This Award-Winning Piece of AI Art Can’t Be Copyrighted::Matthew Allen’s AI art won first prize at the Colorado State Fair. But the US government has ruled it can’t be copyrighted because it’s too much “machine” and not enough “human.”

  • Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Read the article. He added details and the description fed into the prompt was 624 words long. He basically wrote a page describing the scene he wanted created.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which I can also do. “Imagine a cave full of cats. The first cat is pink with yellow dots. The second cat glows in the dark. The third cat…”

      I guess art involves expressing what you want to express it, sure. But also how you express it is part of it as well. If you make the strokes yourself, it’s more impressive. A machine? You gotta do better than making it look like someone painted it.

      It’s like 3D printing. A 3D-printed statue? Neat. But not terribly impressive. A 3D figure that defies all optical illusion explanations? Now we’re talking.

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it your art and are you the artist when you describe a painter or illustrator what they should draw? I can tell you, many clients use more than 624 words.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you wrote 624 words into a machine like a typewriter and published it it would be copyrighted. But those same 624 words fed into another machine can’t be. Funny.

        • Thymos@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The words can be copyrighted alright, that’s not the problem here. Even without publishing them, the creator already has copyright over his 624 words. There’s probably nobody who would be interested in publishing them because, let’s face it, they aren’t that interesting on their own, unlike a novel or a poem. All the stuff that makes this a piece of art is added by the AI, whereas a printing press adds very little to nothing to a book.