• NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
    6·
    1 year ago

    But religion has been used for milleniums as a cover for atrocious actions. At this point, they are not separable. So when is it enough?

    But don’t non-religious dictatorships also commit atrocious actions? In the end a cover is just that: a cover.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      I am not talking about dictatorships only. Religion has been used to cover so many atrocities that it’s impossible to dissociate the actions from the religion itself.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      But don’t non-religious dictatorships also commit atrocious actions?

      Just because people die from heart attacks doesn’t mean cancer does not kill.