New details of the previously reported incident underscore how dependent the U.S. government has become on a company that once had to fight in court to become part of the Washington establishment.
  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    49·
    1 year ago

    “One of the advantages is the huge amount of innovation coming out of the private sector, which the government wants to leverage to stay ahead of China and others,” said Brian Weeden, the director of program planning at the Secure World Foundation, a think tank.

    Well if the government had invested in its space and innovation programs they wouldn’t have to rely on the private sector.

    • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
      12·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I’m kind of glad that they didn’t. Imagine if the US government had even more control and surveillance potential over the internet. I know they already basically have 100% but, I dunno, a network of low-Earth-orbit satellites constantly hovering overhead, covering every square centimetre of the earth, is a bit scary.

      • IronCorgi@kbin.social
        49·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think the same network in the hands of an unstable billionaire is an improvement. Given the choice I’d rather the U.S. have control of the network.

          • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
            21·
            1 year ago

            I think this one is much easier to look at if I restate the choice:

            "A single individual billionaire who has only his self interest in mind has control over the internet "

            vs.

            “An organization consisting of more than one person, who are voted to power, who must hold their own interests in mind as well as their doners at minimum”

            Personally, even if it’s a whole bunch of different billionaires fighting for power, the government ultimately has to answer to more than one person. That makes it an inherently better choice.