• PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah I plan to drive my Corolla shitbox into the ground. The only problem with my plan is that the earth will only be around for a few hundred million years. Maybe a few billion? And (as long as you do the maintenance on time) Corollas will last until the heat death of the universe.

  • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its sad. I LOVE the concept of smart devices, the fact that you can do things so much more conveniently with little interaction. They can absolutely be done without being privacy nightmares, but apparently companies are not interested in that.

      • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t care about my data. I have nothing to hide. Haha they can have my data if they want.

        Literally everyone i know

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then they act all butthurt when they get debt collectors harassing them on social media, or repos using location data to repo a car with missed payments, lol. All the J6 people are a great example of people fucking around with tech and committing crimes, then finding out belatedly :)

          There’s lots of good, non-crime reasons why you might wanna protect your personal data, so you don’t get your identity stolen, your wife thrown in jail for an accidental pregnancy, or being any flavor of queer in a regressive state.

      • gnutrino@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the case of cars there isn’t really an alternative. The study the article cites looked at a bunch of different manufacturers and found the all sucked for privacy.

    • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. I’ve been slowly adding more and more smart devices to my Home Assistant instance and seeing it all interact is super neat. That said, the search for products that work 100% local and don’t depend on the cloud is a total pain, outside of some products using the Zigbee standard and such.

      • GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Zigbee and z-wave is the way to go, yeah. They work completely local and disconnected from the internet (in fact, they cannot directly connect to the internet).

  • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    I post this a second time because this post is more active. What can we do to stop the transfer of data? Can we disconnect the antenna/modem that connects the cars to the Internet?

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know my vehicle has a fuse to pull to disconnect the modem.

    • Logh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m looking into restomods myself. No need to buy a new car and rip it up.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fuck that insurance company. When mine shipped a couple of OBD-II connection boxes for us to install for our auto insurance, I sent them back. They told me I wouldn’t get their special discount if I didn’t install the trackers in our 2 vehicles. I said I’m not installing your tracker boxes regardless. I continue to have car insurance, and those alleged discounts didn’t really amount to much.

  • cloud@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m reposting this in every thread so anyone can see:

    https://www.nissanusa.com/privacy.html

    Sensitive personal information, including driver’s license number, national or state identification number, citizenship status, immigration status, race, national origin, religious or philosophical beliefs, sexual orientation, sexual activity, precise geolocation, health diagnosis data, and genetic information.

      • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Keep sending images of goatse. But seriously speaking, it’s probably not humans that are collating and sifting the data. It’s all being fed to an algorithm.

        • topinambour_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Humans have access to the databases. Now another human can go to the nissan’sheadquarters of their countries, and request by the law of this country, that nissan provides the name of every people who had gay sex in their nissans.

          Then they can arrest them and execute them.

          That’s the issue with collected datas. You ignore when some totilarist government will access those.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          All the more reason to poison the data. Make them think everyone has a breadfucking kink and that they spend their Friday nights getting anally inserted baby carrots beaten back out of them by pimp bodyguards for $1,000.

    • Nightwind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wtf. Genetic information. So they can take your DNA after bringing your car in for service and sell it?

        • Nightwind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was not joking at all - this is exactly what their legal stance is. I agree someone at Nissan is very likely thinking about how to make money with this.

  • Scott@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t really go into depth, but I worked for a major automaker, privacy is a joke for newer cars even if you don’t pay for the Internet plans.

    • pyr0ball@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there anything a mildly competent electronics enthusiast could do to disable any outbound data?

      • Scott@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately not for the company I worked for, all I will say is it was one of the top 5 automakers in the world.

        I assume the others were also doing similar things in their cars.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I unplugged the cellular modem in mine. But it was made last decade, so they probably make those harder to find now.

            • Scott@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hard to say if it’s the same for most of the major auto makers, but from what I had been told by the head unit team, mostly everything for connected services was run through the head unit.

    • Intralexical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nissan also said it collected information on “sexual activity.” It didn’t explain how.

      Nissan doesn’t provide a detailed explanation of how the data is collected, but they say that the source they collect the data is “Direct contact with users and Nissan employees,” Whatever that means.

      Based on this information, I can only infer that the Nissan sales handbook has a section on using seduction for particularly difficult and/or hot potential customers.

      …I used to work at a pizza shop. Oh, so that’s why we got so many orders from the local Nissan dealership!

  • Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are dumb cars still manufactured? I don’t drive so I have no clue what the market’s like.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    But drivers are given little or no control over the personal data their vehicles collect, researchers for the nonprofit Mozilla Foundation said Wednesday in their latest “Privacy Not Included” survey Security standards are also vague, a big concern given automakers’ track record of susceptibility to hacking.

    Cars scored worst for privacy among more than a dozen product categories – including fitness trackers, reproductive-health apps, smart speakers and other connected home appliances – that Mozilla has studied since 2017.

    The absence of such a law lets connected devices and smartphones amass data for tailored ad targeting and other marketing – while also raising the odds of massive information theft through cybersecurity breaches.

    Japan-based Nissan astounded researchers with the level of honesty and detailed breakdowns of data collection its privacy notice provides, a stark contrast with Big Tech companies such as Facebook or Google.

    Further, Nissan says it can share “inferences” drawn from the data to create profiles “reflecting the consumer’s preferences, characteristics, psychological trends, predispositions, behaviour, attitudes, intelligence, abilities, and aptitudes.”

    If an owner opts out of data collection, Tesla’s privacy notice says the company may not be able to notify drivers “in real time” of issues that could result in “reduced functionality, serious damage, or inoperability.”


    The original article contains 874 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 76%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      When Tesla came about ,I said privacy in cars is going to be a problem in the the future if people keep buying them and nobody protests. Well, we are now in that future. Crotch rockets may be our salvation.

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So many health insurance companies would be going public with fat IPOs. Nothing like motorcycles to make the line go sky-high, lol.

        My mom worked in the ER back in the day. Any patients dying of organ failure without a donor just had to make it to the weekend to live (seriously, not joking). People would dust off their cycles for the weekend and then donate and save lives.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Be me

    Siemens Charger

    People using my wifi to get work done

    Cool story, bro

    Oh, look, somebody thought the tracks were a cool place to park

    No parking zone will be enforced with extreme prejudice.

    choo choo

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    But drivers are given little or no control over the personal data their vehicles collect, researchers for the nonprofit Mozilla Foundation said Wednesday in their latest “Privacy Not Included” survey Security standards are also vague, a big concern given automakers’ track record of susceptibility to hacking.

    Cars scored worst for privacy among more than a dozen product categories – including fitness trackers, reproductive-health apps, smart speakers and other connected home appliances – that Mozilla has studied since 2017.

    The absence of such a law lets connected devices and smartphones amass data for tailored ad targeting and other marketing – while also raising the odds of massive information theft through cybersecurity breaches.

    Japan-based Nissan astounded researchers with the level of honesty and detailed breakdowns of data collection its privacy notice provides, a stark contrast with Big Tech companies such as Facebook or Google.

    Further, Nissan says it can share “inferences” drawn from the data to create profiles “reflecting the consumer’s preferences, characteristics, psychological trends, predispositions, behaviour, attitudes, intelligence, abilities, and aptitudes.”

    If an owner opts out of data collection, Tesla’s privacy notice says the company may not be able to notify drivers “in real time” of issues that could result in “reduced functionality, serious damage, or inoperability.”


    The original article contains 874 words, the summary contains 206 words. Saved 76%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!