I’m not great at physics and have no knowledge of aeronautics, so this whole chain of reasoning might be wrong.

A plane stays in the air because air is moving over the wings, which generates lift. However, that air is moving because the engine is moving the plane forward. There is no other source of energy. Therefore, some of the engine’s energy is going into keeping the plane in the air, and some is going into accelerating it forwards, or keeping it at the same speed (fighting air resistance).

Therefore, if the plane points straight up, the engine should be able to support it hovering in the air. If it didn’t have enough power to fight gravity when pointing straight up, it wouldn’t have enough power to fight gravity when moving horizontally, either.

(Okay, some older engines only worked in certain orientations, but I don’t think that’s a problem for jet aircraft, or any aircraft built after WWII.)

So why can only certain planes fly vertically?

    • Skunk@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes you’re correct this wasn’t what I meant.

      I should have said air to push behind you (but same misunderstanding, the air needs to be coming from the front before being pushed), or pull, or something like that, but my English is from video games and Internet so not the most useful technical terms are in my vocabulary :)

      The « pull push » airflow is really well seenable on schematics of newer by-pass engines.

      • Kalash@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I actually deleted my comment, because I misread. I thought you said “pushed against”, but you just said “pushed air”.

        Anyway, now lemmy is bugging out, can only see your comment in my personal notifications.