Four months ago, we asked Are LLMs making Stack Overflow irrelevant? Data at the time suggested that the answer is likely “yes:”

  • Endmaker@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    Even without LLMs, it’s possible StackOverflow would have eventually faded into irrelevance – perhaps driven by moderation policy changes or something else that started in 2014

    💯

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      actually, i was surprised it took off at all, because there are plenty less formal alternatives, but the name is catchy with devs. maybe that’s all it took.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It took off because searching a specific issue is likely to give you a good and comprehensive answer back with minimal effort, so it kept being ranked well in search engines.

        Other less “pedantic” forums are great for discussion and they encourage new questions, but they don’t perform nearly as well for people searching for the answers or the context they’re looking for: there’s too much noise in the discussion and answers are often scattered in multiple topics.