produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoresearchdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up11.23K
arrow-up11.23Kimageresearchdiscuss.tchncs.deprodunis@discuss.tchncs.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-squarepjhenry1216@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoThen your example was poorly chosen. And the meme is poorly formed because it’s technically wrong.
minus-squareSulaymanF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoNo it’s a good example that shows how your assumption of the meme CAN be wrong.
minus-squarepjhenry1216@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSo you agree some perspectives are wrong then at least. So you don’t adhere to your own interpretation.
Then your example was poorly chosen. And the meme is poorly formed because it’s technically wrong.
No it’s a good example that shows how your assumption of the meme CAN be wrong.
Removed by mod
So you agree some perspectives are wrong then at least. So you don’t adhere to your own interpretation.