For the most part people don’t understand tax deductions and how they work, but this is true in the case of “donations in kind” of assets that are either overvalued or were going to be disposed of anyways.
The ideal charitable donation disposes of something you were going to have to pay to get rid of, generates a tax deduction, and makes you look good at the same time.
Perfect example is bogus environmental projects like building a reef out of old tires. It’s win/win/win until everyone finds out that something in the tires actually kills fish
no obviously not that’s not how tax deductions work
similarly to how i’m against corporations being able to donate to politicians, i’d be against corporations being able to donate in such a way that they could influence the school syllabus even if it literally cost them more than the recipient got
What is this Libertarian bullshit doing here?
“corporations shouldn’t be allowed to have influence over what content is taught in schools” is “libertarian bullshit”?
Corporations collect taxes?
No but they “donate to their local community” to get tax deductions / write offs
Let me ask you something: Do you think that when corps donate, they get MORE in tax savings than they put in for donations?
For the most part people don’t understand tax deductions and how they work, but this is true in the case of “donations in kind” of assets that are either overvalued or were going to be disposed of anyways.
The ideal charitable donation disposes of something you were going to have to pay to get rid of, generates a tax deduction, and makes you look good at the same time.
Perfect example is bogus environmental projects like building a reef out of old tires. It’s win/win/win until everyone finds out that something in the tires actually kills fish
Removed by mod
no obviously not that’s not how tax deductions work
similarly to how i’m against corporations being able to donate to politicians, i’d be against corporations being able to donate in such a way that they could influence the school syllabus even if it literally cost them more than the recipient got
Where did it mention taxes?
Apparently the title is the one originally given by the artist