Japan has told its citizens living in China to keep a low profile, including talking quietly in public, after Beijing blasted Tokyo for releasing treated radioactive water from a wrecked nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand why anyone who doesn’t absolutely need to be in China would go there - and I don’t consider a job requirement to be an absolute need. Yes, the country is beautiful, but the CCP is most definitely not, and they own you while you’re in their territory.

    • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      and I don’t consider a job requirement to be an absolute need

      Well, I suppose people who don’t need to work for a living might struggle to understand the lives and motivations of other people, who, you know, have to take risks and make sacrifices in their lives.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Take it easy. I’m referring to consulate jobs, international business, and such. Usually, if you’re qualified for that, you have other options that don’t require moving to a police state.

        • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would someone with a consulate job avoid China, of all places?

          Employees of foreign governments, especially in embassies and related posts, have very specific rights under international law. They have a huge amount of leeway compared to tourists, who often can get more than nationals.

          Honestly, China is Disneyland compared to a lot of the rest of the planet. I knew personnel who were stationed in the USSR and Eastern Europe during the Cold War, including one woman who got the crap beaten out of her for meeting with the Solidarity people in Poland despite having a diplomatic passport. I’ve also been to even more colorful places myself at the government’s request. International business is the same. Millions of people travel to China every year for business.

          No one is going to mistake China for Norway, but it’s also hardly the DPRK. I’d even go to the DPRK just for the hell of it if I could.

          • magnetosphere@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            I wouldn’t trust the CCP not to pull the same things that happened in Eastern Europe and the USSR, that’s all.

  • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Some cliff notes for those wondering what the fuss is about:

    • In 2011, three nuclear reactors in Fukushima went into meltdown and released radioactive contamination into the environment, including oceanwater
    • The facilities remain flooded with a volume of contaminated water that has been described as “500 Olympic-sized pools”
    • As part of the ongoing effort to clean up Fukushima, Japan wants to eventually remove all of the remaining contaminated water
    • Japan’s plan to do this involves reducing the radioactivity of the water using a filtration process known as ALPS while staging out water releases over a period of 30 years
    • The main remaining contaminant in the water following ALPS filtration is expected to be Tritium, which samples show as existing within the threshold that is considered safe for human consumption.
    • This plan was approved by the UN after determining that the radiological impact would be “negligible”
    • China and South Korea both oppose the plan. Wang Wenbin, a spokesman for the the Chinese Foreign Ministry was quoted calling the plan “extremely selfish and irresponsible” and stated that “The ocean is humanity’s common good, not Japan’s private sewer”
    • Concerns over Tritium release have been criticized, as other active reactors in the region are known to release similar levels of the substance into the ocean (e.g.: those at the Yangjiang nuclear plant), though it is also worth noting that this criticism hinges upon the assumption that the ALPS filtration process will be as reliable as early results suggest. It requires trusting that Japan will be completely diligent in overseeing their filtration efforts so that radioactive Cesium is not released into oceanwater.
    • Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wang Wenbin, a spokesman for the the Chinese Foreign Ministry was quoted calling the plan “extremely selfish and irresponsible” and stated that “The ocean is humanity’s common good, not Japan’s private sewer”

      That’s rich, coming from China.

      • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah they launched a bunch of rockets at the ocean not that long ago so they can’t like it that much.

        Fuck the CCP

        • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except the waste water doesn’t actually have high levels of either of those, as it’s been diluted well below the safe minimums before release

          Theres no actual science to back up the fears about their handling of this - just your standard “nuclear = bad and scary”

          Wait till you guys find out about bananas

    • Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      500 Olympic-sized pools

      Why do people use football fields and swimming pools as units of measurement.

      • Ilovethebomb
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can mentally picture an Olympic swimming pool, that’s why.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I assume it’s to help people visualize volume/distance/size/etc. If an article said “50,000 gallons”, it would be much more precise, but also harder to relate to. When an article says “500 Olympic-sized pools”, it’s significantly easier to picture in my mind.

        It’s also worth remembering that this is a newspaper intended for the casual edification of the general public, not a scientific document.

  • Parabola@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Blasted”. Oh no what ever will grown adults do about someone on twitter “blasting” them.

    It saddens me how much like idiocracy the world has become.