• blakestacey@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Suppose you say that you’re 99.99% confident that 2 + 2 = 4.

    Then you’re a dillbrain.

    Then you have just asserted that you could make 10,000 independent statements, in which you repose equal confidence, and be wrong, on average, around once. Maybe for 2 + 2 = 4 this extraordinary degree of confidence would be possible

    Yes, how extraordinary that I can say every day that the guy in front of me at the bodega won’t win the Powerball. Or that [SystemRandom().random() >= 0.9999 for i in range(10000)] makes a list that is False in all but one spot.

    P(x|y) is defined as P(x,y)/P(y). P(A|A) is defined as P(A,A)/P(A) = P(A)/P(A) = 1. The ratio of these two probabilities may be 1, but I deny that there’s any actual probability that’s equal to 1. P(|) is a mere notational convenience, nothing more.

    No, you kneebiter.

    • titotal@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I roll a fair 100 sided dice.

      Eliezer asks me to state my confidence that I won’t roll a 1.

      I say I am 99% confident I won’t roll a 1, using basic math.

      Eliezer says “AHA, you idiot, I checked all of your past predictions and when you predicted something with confidence 99%, it only happened 90% of the time! So you can’t say you’re 99% confident that you won’t roll a 1”

      I am impressed by the ability of my past predictions to affect the roll of a dice, and promptly run off to become a wizard.

      • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah but the machine gods could be tinkering with your neural wiring to make you think you’re rolling a die when in reality the universe is nothing but the color pink. That’s right, reality is nothing but a shade of Fuchsia and dice don’t actually exist. You should take this possibility into account when adjusting your priors for some reason.

        Epistemic Status: Barbie.