Nine months after Kenneth Smith’s botched lethal injection, state attorney general has asked for approval to kill him with nitrogen

  • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s experimental. No institutional review board in the country could ethically ask this guy to volunteer for such an experiment, simply because of the coercive power dynamics inherent in asking such a thing of a prisoner. But the government can, by fiat, decide to experiment on him, and you’re ok with that? Even if “nitrogen asphyxiation is a comparatively peaceful way to go,” human medical experimentation qualifies as cruel and unusual punishment; otherwise, what’s the point of banning cruel and unusual punishment?

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only experiment is doing it to humans. It’s used to kill chickens by the thousands. Because it causes them less stress, leading to better tasting meat.

      • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right. So it’s human medical experimentation on a prisoner. Which, ask any social scientist, is some seriously fucked up, unethical shit.

          • APassenger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Someone who meets euthanasia standards in a state volunteers to do it.

            If I was terminal, it’s something I’d consider. For science.

            But I don’t think I’d do it so they can kill people with less remorse.

            Talked myself into a corner there. But a bloodless, mess-less, painless way to die could be useful to people who want to die with dignity.

          • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            In my opinion, the only morally acceptable next step is abolishing the death penalty. But, if I objected solely on the basis of the medical experimentation angle, an extensive formal review of the body of evidence by a panel of actual medical experts, plus not using as a subject a guy who already underwent one botched execution, at the very least?

          • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “It’s only experimental in that it’s never been done before…”

            Why yes, that’s right. Which is what “experimental” means. Assuming you know what will happen before trying something is deeply unscientific.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It isn’t experimental is the way the word is normally used. We know what the effects of nitrogen asphyxiation are. People are accidentally killed by it all the time. If were going to have a death penalty (and I would argue we shouldn’t) then we should seek less cruel ways to do it, which nitrogen asphyxiation is.