A VPN isn’t going to protect you from malware or trackers. I’m not sure how they can get away with this marketing.

If you want to boost your security focus on your web browser

  • MangoPenguin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ispot.tv is on one of my DNS blacklists, it seems to be an advertising service?

    Many VPNs have built in traffic filtering that does block common malware, phishing, and tracking domains/IPs.

    Their advertising claims still do get a bit ridiculous though.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, they’re not completely telling the truth, but they aren’t exactly lying either.

      • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I don’t buy it.

        Instead of tapping individual connections, you now only have to tap the traffic to/from the VPNs exit nodes. Then you correlate incoming packets with outgoing packets (e.g. based on size, timing, etc) and you know the origin of the traffic.

        Bonus is that it acts as a filter, people using a VPN want to hide their traffic so you specifically want to watch those people.

  • phx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    They have some additional services they advertise that supposedly deals with these, though I’d imagine they require installed software which would give them more visibility into systems than I’m comfortable with.

    For trackers and to some extent malware, they could potentially block some by disallowing outgoing traffic from the VPN to known tracker IP’s/domains or C&C hosts/networks, but I could see that being fairly infectivity overall with potentially for false positives.

  • ijeff@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re probably referring to their DNS ad and malicious domain filter.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought the ‘security’ angle was just a smokescreen anyway. Isn’t it actually for accessing region-locked media?

          • tsz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Name a popular service that isn’t encrypted but using it might expose you in a legitimate way.

        • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, not really with these, per se. My own VPN, Wireguard, routes back through my pihole service to double down on it’s filtering. For the most, I’m not trying to obfuscate my ip. If I wanted to do that I’d use tor or something. I just don’t want my traffic to be easily snooped on when I’m connected to wifi that isn’t mine.

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, if you access things on the internet you could be sued for, your IP will not appear in the logs of your ISP or the webserver you connected to.

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sure. But they can’t advertise on that point. So they claim it’s for malware and tracking protection even though that makes no sense.