• EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Concidering we already have robotic birds dropping explosive on enemies in curren warfare, this really isn’t that big of a deal

    • Seudo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Automation is the big deal. Drones have cameras so humans can make a (hopefully) informed disision to strike or not. When (read; now) the drone doesn’t need a camera because it can make the call without a human in the loop, we have removed a vital bottleneck.

      The only thing that stopped WWI from being total war is that when we wipped out an entire generation, we needed time to grow more troops. If autonomous weapons being manufactured autonomously by autonomously constructed factories… whoever controled the drones could of conquered the world.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, that assumes that resources and energy are unlimited. This is the main problem with any “grey goo” scenario.

        And it wasn’t people being killed that stopped WW2. People are killed in every war. The defensive weaponry was more powerful than the offensive weaponry. Machine guns were only used on defense because they were heavy. Also, artillery was not mechanized so it was hard to move everything forward quickly.

    • ram@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to mention millions or even billions of robotic drones that monitor us all.