• Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 days ago

    Playing F4 made me realise more than ever that the draw of the Fallout universe for me is the ability to uncover hidden dialogue options by tweaking your skills the right way.

    I never finished it and it makes me sad.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        Yeah I went with the science dudes and didn’t even get to subjugate the wasteland with a robot army afterwards. Lame.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          Bro you missed the point

          You already did that!

          The MITechnocracy rules the area. They control everything but those weirdos in Goodneighbor, and those guys are too busy getting high.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Eh, that’s just the state of things when the Tech Fuhrer declares his heir and dies within a relatively short period, there’s still a political struggle that would happen after the events of the game.

              I choose to believe my version hacks/gains the allegiance of the Coursers and murders his enemies in their sleep. Knowing Bethesda though, if that end does end up being canon the opposite will happen.

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                20 days ago

                there’s still a political struggle that would happen after the events of the game.

                Yeah, I wanted to participate in that.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 days ago

    I wonder if they could fix that by having 4 options that align with whatever archetype you’ve selected.

    Then you don’t need “ridiculously good” “meh” “ridiculously evil” “… Just continue the story” options

    Pick if you want to play ridiculously good, meh, or ridiculously evil at the start of the game, or if you want to be a passive observer. They’d have to write 3x more player dialogue, but that’s really not that much (have the responses barely change, you know they barely change anyways)

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 days ago

      That blows up the conversation trees by 4 times how many archetypes there are. You can do the smart thing like bg3 or fallout new Vegas and add options to the more generic ones based on archetypes

      • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        I tried to address that by 1) having the silent protagonist option where the story unfolds as it would without the flourish before the canned response so now it’s only 3x as much, and 2) all of the response dialog is the same because they were going to reply the same way as they would to the good or bad option anyways.

        This will triple the amount of PC options that need to be “written” but the rest of the writing (NPC dialog) doesn’t have to change at all, and that’s where most of the writing goes anyways.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 days ago

    In theory my dialog choices are better and more plentiful, but in practice that timer is real short and so my answer is to always stall, “Um… hmm.” Telltale hard mode out here

    • Burninator05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      You should try it with lowered perception (hearing issues). You spend half the timer just trying to figure out what they said before you can even begin to craft a response.