L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoGoogle Removes ‘Pirate’ URLs from Users’ Privately Saved Linkstorrentfreak.comexternal-linkmessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1600file-textcross-posted to: tech@kbin.socialhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1600external-linkGoogle Removes ‘Pirate’ URLs from Users’ Privately Saved Linkstorrentfreak.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square100fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: tech@kbin.socialhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.party
minus-squaretomich@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 year agoIt’s not on bookmarks. Is on collections(a different thing) that are public, shareable and technically hosted by Google. This whole thing has been overblown by not fact checking.
minus-squareGrimy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoIt deleted them from public and private collections. If google was taking out mentions of Tiananmen Square at China’s request, would you be okay with it?
minus-squaremac@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThat’s a giant leap and massively different.
minus-squareGrimy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoBoth are blatant forms of censorship, one is extreme but the principal is the exact same.
It’s not on bookmarks. Is on collections(a different thing) that are public, shareable and technically hosted by Google. This whole thing has been overblown by not fact checking.
It deleted them from public and private collections.
If google was taking out mentions of Tiananmen Square at China’s request, would you be okay with it?
That’s a giant leap and massively different.
Both are blatant forms of censorship, one is extreme but the principal is the exact same.