• AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or given that the device’s purpose is to be a prop for psychological manipulation, the current ones might, rather than simply reading out skin resistance, produce some other value more conducive to that purpose. I’m which case, dumping and disassembling the firmware would be as much a threat to Scientology as dumping slot machine firmware would be to casinos and gambling firms. (True story: someone once did this with a slot machine, proving that it was rigged.)

        • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          My headcanon is that they’re a bacteria that feeds on the force rather than that they control the force or grant powers. They need a host so that’s why you find lots of them in force sensitive people.

          • Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My head cannon is just that they’re attracted to beings that can manipulate the force

            They don’t give any powers. But the more you have the higher your latent abilities are and they can just sense that

    • Bizarroland@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Although you do realize that technically, if their new versions are not patented then they are considered trade secrets right? If you can get your hands on one and patent it then you have a decent pathway to sue the Church of Scientology for patent infringement.

      That would be a fun one to work out

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I like that fundamental misunderstandings of how the law works can still be found on this website, was my favorite part of reddit

        • Rayston@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          wouldnt that force them to admit the public patent and all its details are a copy? thus confirming exactly how the device works…and isnt that something they dont want?

        • Bizarroland@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They would still have to pay an inordinate amount of money in legal fees fighting it, and if they invalidate the patent then the publication would go public domain.