The song is not about “rich men” in general but about politicians in Washington DC. Those are, specifically, the “rich men north of Richmond” he is discussing.
His claim is not that business owners pay too little, but that the government is taking too much, and giving it to welfare queens.
You may want to consider reading the actual lyrics.
He mentions politicians every time the chorus comes around. That is what “rich men north of Richmond” means. That’s why he isn’t calling out wealthy people south of Richmond. DC is north of Richmond.
I can’t tell you why the song is popular, but I can definitely parse the meaning of the lyrics, which you seem to be struggling with.
These rich men north of Richmond
Lord knows they all just wanna have total control
Wanna know what you think, wanna know what you do
And they don’t think you know, but I know that you do
'Cause your dollar ain’t shit and it’s taxed to no end
Cause of rich men north of Richmond
This is explicitly about politicians. The entire song is.
The only other lyrics with any content are
Well, God, if you’re 5-foot-3 and you’re 300 pounds
Taxes ought not to pay for your bags of fudge rounds
Young men are puttin’ themselves six feet in the ground
‘Cause all this damn country does is keep on kickin’ them down
Lambasting “welfare queens” and taxes.
Needless to say, this song isn’t popular with me, because I am capable of understanding both the lyrics and how taxes and welfare work within the context of the economy.
At no point does he decry wealthy business owners or anything of the sort, which sort of takes away from your “any political leanings” argument. This is very explicitly one political leaning, and from a person who isn’t very knowledgeable.
Art can be interpreted, yes, but if I look at a picture of the Mona Lisa and think it is an excellent painting of a duck, I am incorrect.
There is, in fact, a correct way to interpret poetry and verse. I should know, because I literally have a degree in it and used to teach high school English.
The specifics of this song are not open to interpretation - it is a song about how the federal government gives “hard working men’s” tax dollars to “undeserving” people on welfare.
By the same token, Taylor Swift’s “Cruel Summer” is not about global warming.
It’s okay to be wrong and it is a sign of self-confidence and intelligence to accept when you are wrong.
You can still enjoy the song if the actual meaning makes you feel good, or even if you just think it’s a banger. No one is trying to take that from you.
The song is not about “rich men” in general but about politicians in Washington DC. Those are, specifically, the “rich men north of Richmond” he is discussing.
His claim is not that business owners pay too little, but that the government is taking too much, and giving it to welfare queens.
You may want to consider reading the actual lyrics.
Removed by mod
He mentions politicians every time the chorus comes around. That is what “rich men north of Richmond” means. That’s why he isn’t calling out wealthy people south of Richmond. DC is north of Richmond.
I can’t tell you why the song is popular, but I can definitely parse the meaning of the lyrics, which you seem to be struggling with.
This is explicitly about politicians. The entire song is.
The only other lyrics with any content are
Lambasting “welfare queens” and taxes.
Needless to say, this song isn’t popular with me, because I am capable of understanding both the lyrics and how taxes and welfare work within the context of the economy.
At no point does he decry wealthy business owners or anything of the sort, which sort of takes away from your “any political leanings” argument. This is very explicitly one political leaning, and from a person who isn’t very knowledgeable.
Removed by mod
Those rich cities aren’t taxing people.
This is just basic understanding of verse man, not sure how else to help you. You are absolutely incorrect here.
Removed by mod
They aren’t taxing people where he lives. I suppose it was wrong of me to assume you’d understand that since these lyrics are challenging for you.
Removed by mod
Art can be interpreted, yes, but if I look at a picture of the Mona Lisa and think it is an excellent painting of a duck, I am incorrect.
There is, in fact, a correct way to interpret poetry and verse. I should know, because I literally have a degree in it and used to teach high school English.
The specifics of this song are not open to interpretation - it is a song about how the federal government gives “hard working men’s” tax dollars to “undeserving” people on welfare.
By the same token, Taylor Swift’s “Cruel Summer” is not about global warming.
It’s okay to be wrong and it is a sign of self-confidence and intelligence to accept when you are wrong.
You can still enjoy the song if the actual meaning makes you feel good, or even if you just think it’s a banger. No one is trying to take that from you.