Is it a PTB move (!yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com) to ban a user if their only activity in a community is downvoting posts?

The behaviour baffles me a bit. If they dislike the majority of the posts in a community, why are they subscribed? Or if they are browsing by /all, why have they not blocked the community? Are they under the mistaken impression that Lemmy has an algorithm which uses downvotes as an indicator for “show me less of this”?

Has anyone else encountered a “serial downvoter” in any of their communities?

  • jenni007@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m a serial voter (up and down), I have an opinion about practically everything. If anyone as a result gets a lot of down votes, they should perhaps create more content that I like? Just a suggestion.

    • misk@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      That’s not bad per se but is your vote based on whether you agree with something or whether it contributes something of value to the community?

      Many people use downvote as a „dislike” button which defeats the purpose of news-based communities where it’s the newsworthiness that matters. Of course I don’t like that Russia bombed children but I will upvote it so more people see it, for example.

    • rglullis@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I have an opinion about practically everything

      Where is the /s?

      they should perhaps create more content that I like?

      Your account is less than 15 days old. You have 57 comments and one single post about politics. Not exactly the type of discussion that is interesting or valuable to the network.

      Perhaps you should lead by example and post more of the stuff that you like? It’s very easy to criticize, not so easy to actually show up and do the stuff that is needed.