• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    The main issue I know about is in how messages are stored (the top CVE in that list). If a phone is compromised, all chat history could be exfiltrated. That’s incredibly unlikely for a regular citizen, but it’s a lot more likely for an important position like the head of the Department of Defense or something.

    NOTE: the vendor disputes the relevance of this finding because the product is not intended to protect against adversaries with this degree of local access.

    • kittenzrulz123
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Im not a security researcher tbh and I havent extensively studied the security model of Signal (I use Matrix)

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Same. I’m just generally pretty cyber-security curious, and have read a bit on this topic.

        I think Signal and Matrix are absolutely fantastic. I use Signal as an SMS replacement and Matrix for group chats, and I whole-heartedly recommend both.

        BTW, thanks for providing the CVEs, I hope that answers a few peoples’ questions about it. One thing to note is that a high number of CVEs is indicative of a lot of academic interest, which is a good indicator that a project is interesting to the security community. So seeing a lot of CVEs is a good thing, assuming the more critical ones get close quickly (and Signal does a good job keeping up with updates).

        • kittenzrulz123
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          Thats why the Linux kernel has a massive amount of CVEs, its extensively audited and researched.