• SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          You still can’t use the 5th to infer anything about the defendant in a criminal case. In a civil case, the court can take a person’s refusal to answer into account.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Some rulings that pleading the 5th can be considered cause for a warrant if not directly an admission of guilt.

            The past decade or so has also weakened rights in regards to you having to plead the 5th directly, and of course the “War on Terror” led to the Supreme Court more or less saying “No, actually, torture doesn’t count, plus we’re going to ignore that it’s been the official position of America for centuries that Constitutional rights are human rights (for a changing definition of human).”

            Taken as a whole the past couple decades have severely reduced the protections the government wants to admit the 5th offers.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      You mean by a court subpoena? If so then you testify or get found in contempt of court.

      Or do you mean what if someone is threatened/blackmailed into giving false testimony? If that’s the case then you should probably go to the police. If it’s law enforcement who are coercing you then I suppose you could try to include that fact in the testimony, but there may not be much difference in that and refusing to comply with the blackmailer in the first place, in terms of your safety.

      If you’re coerced to lie under oath then I’d guess that still counts as perjury, but I doubt most judges would be mad at you for it; they’d shit fury all over whoever was coercing you.