• Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    But saying “NOT [evil word]” is kind of important when you are trying to draw boundaries and inform people. If you are vague about the word that shouldn’t be associated with femboys, then people can claim ignorance.

    Also, the one with the female symbol is not about females, it is about things femboys are not: Not girl, not fetish, not egg.

    Does that make sense? Let me know if you need more clarification. 😊

    • Smorty [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      ahaaa, see, dis mek mor sens… bt alsuu… thn why is the table not:

      <femboy flag or symbol or word> ❌ or som othr word
      supr pretty boi supr pretty girl
      man woman

      u see my point?.. now its:

      a man not womn
      ur fren <3 not sissy
      human being not here to please curiosity
      ur luvd one not tranny

      which… i wud say dis cud be falsely interpreted vrri easily. dis rlli is a table wif male column havin comfi words, n female column havin "not " + uncomfy_word

      i see the point, i kno dis post is not evil n i believe peeps correctin me on stuff r correct <3

      bt i wan to say, dis vrri mch cn be falsely interprtd…

      or rathr: if the female symbol were replavd wif transfem flag, peeps would be way more aggrsiv bout dis one i thinksies

      n now ur obligated to commnt agn, becuz i but the “but actulli i thinksies i hav point” part at end of commnt…

      • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I get what you are saying. It would have been better to use X symbol as the header and maybe female symbol under as one of the things femboy is not. I can see how it could be misinterpreted.

        Nice use of the table!