• ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 days ago

    It just about always comes down to user error. The White House trusting Signal is very indicative of the effectiveness of the app’s underlying protocols and the organization’s commitment to privacy. This is definitely huge publicity and I hope Signal endures the limelight.

    • Prox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      LOL what kinda bullshit comment is this?

      The people in the White House are idiots. They choose Signal because they’re either dumb/negligent -or- because they have been intentionally avoiding record preservation requirements.

      Signal is a solid app for sure, but these dipshits didn’t choose it for being the right tool for the job here, as it certainly is not.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 days ago

        -or- because they have been intentionally avoiding record preservation requirements.

        It’s this one

        dipshits didn’t choose it for being the right tool for the job here, as it certainly is not.

        It was, actually. If they weren’t dipshits it wouldn’t have been a problem.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Signal, on your personal device, is fine for personal use. It is absolutely not fine for classified communication as the VP or head of DoD, as there are billions of dollars dedicated to compromising your phone.

          The encryption doesn’t mean shit if they breach an endpoint or account.

          If it was strictly personal chat, yeah, no problem, but they just have to assume the messages are being read by other nations.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            That’s absolutely correct. Everyone seems to fixate on the encryption, but hackers are lazy and they’ll attack whatever is weakest. In this case that means the storage on the phone after it’s decrypted.

            Don’t store classified information on your phone, regardless of what you use to transmit it.

            • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              Or better yet, do whatever the heck security experts tell you to do. I can only imagine what’s standard procedure for the president’s cabinet.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Exactly. I can guess as to what decent OPSec looks like, but that’s not my job and I’m not an expert. If you’re in a sensitive position, listen to the experts. If you’re a hobbyist, do whatever strikes your fancy.

      • sem
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s not the right tool for their job but still a good tool for the laws they were trying to break…

      • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I wholeheartedly agree the White House is full of morons. I was just saying that Signal is a solid app for me to securely share bullshit with my family. Its definitely not the right tool for government officials to use. But its plenty safe for sharing memes and pics of my dog.

    • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      The white house trusting signal is nice, but using it to circumvent official communication tools which document messages for the archives is not the way it should be used - they used the “disappearing messages”-feature as well. This usage is more in line with criminal organizations like the mafia or yakuza.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I believe some people have been ordered to archive the chat so that it can be presented to Congress in the future. Trouble is, looking at the screenshots it’s already gone as they had the message lifetime set to a week.

        I wonder if this will be seen as destroying evidence .

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            There very much are law requiring archival, but now it’s been ordered in the hearings as well. This makes it much more obvious that it’s a problem.