Their ToS only allow one account per person…

Does anyone here have more than 1 free account on such platforms?

Has there been cases where people got banned for having more than 1 free account?

  • monovergent 🛠️@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Nothing yet. This came about before I learned to use email aliases, so I created a couple accounts in fear of being correlated across shopping sites and other services. Though at no point did I consume more than 500 MB across my accounts, the limit for one free account. Not that this exonerates me, but I’d imagine heavy use across free accounts would raise suspicions sooner.

    If anyone at Proton is reading this, my apologies and many thanks for graciously providing these accounts for free the past several years. I’ll stop leeching resources once I finish migrating to my new email provider.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      If anyone at Proton is reading this […] I’ll stop leeching resources once I finish migrating to my new email provider.

      lol

  • liliumstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yeah, I remember someone getting all their Proton accounts banned, but they had a large amount, basically using it as a disposable provider. Don’t be that person and ruin it for everyone.

    I have two with Proton and have had two with Tuta. I don’t think either would bother coming down on that. It could very easily be two people sharing a device with different email accounts or so forth.

  • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Proton explicitly enabled keeping 2 free accounts on the mobile apps quite some time ago, probably more than a year, so they’re cool with you having 2 like that.

    If you get more, you’ll be hampered at the application level, but, unless it’s like a load of accounts for spam purposes, having just a handful shouldn’t get you banned, I believe

    • Pirata@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I kinda get it for people who want to compartmentalise their email.

      I personally have 1 email I only use for banks and other important logins, and then a second one that is a bit more general use.

      • markvandijk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sounds obvious. Didn’t think about that, focused too much on privacy related reasons haha. > markva

    • rolandtb303@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      idk if i would inherently say that, but the CEO does have some worms in his brain so there’s that.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 days ago

    Probably nothing would happen to you. They might correlate your IP address and ban you, but that’s likely it.

    However, don’t do that. Servers aren’t free, and if people abuse the charity of these services, they’ll stop offering free options for everyone.

    If you need extra addresses, use something like https://addy.io/. if you need more storage, might be worth considering self-hosting your email.

    • Pirata@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Probably nothing would happen to you. They might correlate your IP address and ban you, but that’s likely it.

      I mean, that’s probably the worst thing that can happen to your email, lol. Consider how much your online life depends on access to your email.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        True, but I would suppose that depends how intertwined your account is with your life. A couple of new accounts probably wouldn’t matter that much. I just more meant that they wouldn’t try to sue you, or something.

        • azalty@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          For sure, but the lack of feature to reply/send is certainly limiting after a certain point

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I’m able to reply just fine. They have a special address that goes to your inbox, and when you reply, it looks like you’re replying from that alias and not your main email address.

            That was one of the first things I checked on, since replying is sometimes necessary.

            You can also send by going into your Aliases and clicking “Send” by one of your aliases. This will open a dialogue that creates the recipient address you need to use in whatever email address is verified with Addy.

            ETA: and to be abundantly clear, I’m using the free tier. This is all included in the free option.

            • azalty@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Free plan states

              Anonymous Reply + Send From Daily Limit “X”

              as unsupported for the free plan… So I’m quite surprised

    • azalty@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Sure but they probably make more than enough money. Email is really cheap to run

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Perhaps, but you’re just guessing. I don’t know their operating costs, and I would suspect that neither do you.

        If you know better, please enlighten me.

        • azalty@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Again, just relatively common sense.

          Postfix etc… isn’t that hard to run. I selfhost a mailcow installation, which is considered “full” and “expensive to run” and it’s still really fine to run. Not expensive when scaling up to multiple users, the most important is the initial performance cost per instance.

          We’re mostly paying for salaries and R&D I believe. They’re developing other services and stuff, but they could easily charge less and still be profitable, they just wouldn’t have this much reserves.

          Perhaps they don’t realise that by lowering their subscription costs, they could get more users… like me

  • irotsoma
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think it’s unlikely to be enforced for normal use. If you use them for spam or to store a ton of data or some other abusive usage, they might shit down your accounts, but it would be pretty customer-unfriendly to do that for someone with just two accounts and not abusing it. Most privacy respecting services are too young to have gotten to the screw customers, only short-term profit phase of capitalism.

  • plim@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    really?

    protonmail has a “switch account” function. i would never pay the bastards and have two acocounts. no problem.