Time to break free of traditional political ideological labeling and divisions. Time to abandon old, divisive sociopolitical labels like “liberal” and “conservative”.

A new political party based on a vastly, commonly held virtures lends itself to embrace over 66% of Americans, and it clearly embraces progressive principled thinking. In the most ideal American sense of unity, a political party should not be able to be defined or placed as “to the left” or “to the right” of where the Democratic or Republican parties currently are. Just let it exist organically based on present-day principled thinking. The American Progressive Majority.


Originally Posted By u/Atlanticbboy At 2025-03-23 04:38:18 AM | Source


    • underwire212@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s because the phrase “Medicare for all” has been propagandized. If you instead asked if people wanted “affordable medical treatment and preventative care for themselves and others”, I’m sure that number would be much higher.

        • Lyrl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          The idea is Medicare for all as baseline, and private market on top of that. Every country with single payer health care also has private market clinics. The idea that private markets would be outlawed is a misunderstanding, and when pushed by those who would make less money under a single baseline payer system, is misinformation.

            • Lyrl@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              When basic healthcare is universally covered, premiums or out of pocket just for anything considered an extra service aren’t directly comparable to premiums for insurance for all Healthcare. They will be much less, because they cover less, because anything the government designates a core service is provided at no cost.

              Private insurance or just out of pocket costs (they are lower costs, cut out the middleman of insurance) on top of universal health care systems can be upgrades to included services - like getting a private hospital room rather than having a roommate - or could be going to clinics that only have private patients and offer services outside what the government plan covers. For insurance plans (as opposed to out of pocket), the specifically private network would be smaller because the general care government plan would cover almost every provider, and the private plan is just adding on a few on top.

              I believe Medicaid (for certain low income people) unfortunately has much higher barriers to coverage than Medicare (for over 65s), but any insurance is going to have a denial rate. No system has infinite money to cover every service, and setting expectations for coverage like what Medicare provides today is realistic.

              Sadly, I don’t believe it is true that Americans broadly want universal healthcare coverage. The idea that people less healthy and poorer than citizen X deserve nothing from the society they live in is really widespread. Even if the efficiencies of having a one payer system are brought up (so much money is currently spent navigating the multi-labyrinth of our multitude of different insurance companies), there is some feeling that less healthy people who can’t afford care deserve to suffer. I encounter this occasionally even in liberal spaces like lemmy, and it is pervasive if I lurk in more conservative platforms.

    • alkbch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      About 70% of Americans are overweight or obese, why should healthy people be penalized more because of them?

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Because of something called the social contract.

        But I guess you think you are so young and healthy that you will never grow old or becoming unhealthy.

        What an egoistic shit take BTW.

        • alkbch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Of course I will grow old, age is not the point here. It’s about unhealthy life choices.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            If you think drug users chose it, then you are quite unknowing about how things work. Most people with bad habits would love to not having them, but everyone can’t be some sort of superman and just do everything right.

            • alkbch@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              We were talking about obesity and unhealthy food habits. Most drug users chose to start doing drugs, and some drugs are fine in small doses with moderation.

              You are right though it can be difficult to break bad habits, the book atomic habits may help with that.

        • alkbch@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          How is Medicare funded? Healthcare costs are a lot higher for obese and overweight people.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Health insurance costs mostly come from profiteering. The cost savings of not having middlemen more than makes up for needing to pay for people with special needs.

            That’s why it’s always always cheaper in countries with public insurance.

            • alkbch@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Sure but we are very far from being able to have a nationwide public insurance system.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Okay, but we’re talking about having a nationwide public insurance system.

                The fact is, even if you don’t do anything to encourage healthier lifestyles, public insurance is cheaper. You’re being penalized right now by your private insurance carrier who is profiteering off of you. Abolish those middlemen and you save money, regardless of public obesity.

                • alkbch@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  If you follow U.S. politics, you know that’s not happening anytime soon.