• onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nintendo had registered the patents in a filing not long after Palworld’s release, setting the stage for the lawsuit.

    How is that even legal? Decades after releasing something, a competitor comes along and releases their product, so you decide “now’s the time to file a patent” and you can kill the competitor. That should create a very unstable business environment as no new business can be safe when making a patent check as they can be filed after you created a product by somebody else. It makes no sense.

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was just thinking this. Japan’s patent system is so fucked up. You can do everything right, look up all relevant existing patents to make sure you’re in the clear, then a competitor ex post facto files and kills your business.

      • Didros@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Doubt that any company would get away with this. Maybe only biggest hundred or so

        • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          This is literally what Nintendo is doing right now.

          They filled this suit, and only THEN filed for a bunch of extra patents they didn’t already have in order to increase the damages they could claim from Pocket Pair for being in violation.

          I already think patents for game design mechanics are idiotic an unethical, but this is absolutely insane.

          • Didros@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, I said “get away with” and you said “they are doing” these can both be true, and I even provided the reason, too big to fail.

    • bruce965@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      I didn’t downvote, but I found it quite unclear and vague.

      Nintendo announced the lawsuit […] we were just about to go to Tokyo Game Show, so obviously we had to scale back a little bit and hire security guards and stuff like that."

      I don’t follow the connection… Why do you need security guards in response to a lawsuit?

      • Malix@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just a hunch, but have you seen how rabid some nintendo -fans are? If a word of the lawsuit got out some whacko’s could try something. Ref. “Zelda-game got only 8/10? Send death threats to reviewer.” mentality.

        • bruce965@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Okay, that makes sense 😅

          Well, I guess I am not informed on such details. Maybe one of the people downvoting were in my same situation. Although I guess this kind of websites expect their visitors to already know about the context.