• @DonnieDarkmode@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4610 months ago

    So these two provisions caught my eye; under the draft agreement, executive branch agencies (the article gives the example of the DOJ or DOD) would have the ability to (among other things)

    Examine TikTok’s U.S. facilities, records, equipment and servers with minimal or no notice,

    In some circumstances, require ByteDance to temporarily stop TikTok from functioning in the United States.

    In the case of the former, would that include user data? Given the general US gov approach to digital privacy I assume so, and granting yourself the power to do the things you’re afraid China is doing seems appropriately ironic for us.

    As far as the latter, I wonder how broadly “some circumstances” is defined. If the language is broad enough, that would open the door to de facto censorship if a certain trend or info around a certain event is spreading on the site right as the government magically decides it needs to pause TikTok due to, “uh, terrorism or something, don’t worry about it.”

    I’m also curious how durable this agreement would be. How hard would it be for the next administration to decide to pitch a fit and renegotiate or throw out the deal pending a new, even harsher agreement?

    It would seem to me that this is pretty nakedly an assertion of power over an entity based outside the US, and not an agreement meant to protect US citizens in any meaningful way. I think any defense of this agreement as a way to protect privacy or mental health or whatever won’t be able to honestly reconcile with the fact that these exact same concerns exist with domestic social media companies

    • @argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      So basically, the US government doesn’t actually mind all the creepy data harvesting; it just minds not getting a spot at the trough. Typical.

    • pjhenry1216
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I mean, it’s not just because it’s outside the US. It’s because ByteDance is legally required to collect and hand over data to the Chinese government. And it’s well beyond what any other social media app does plus unnecessary for the functionality of the app. This is not about xenophobia. This is legit about trying to stop the Chinese government from spying on US citizens who are too ignorant to realize what that app is. They just care about stupid videos.

      Edit: for example, if you’re on a government network, there’s a good chance half your calls to GitHub hosted content will timeout with no response. Why? Because GitHub has load balances that direct traffic occasionally through a server hosted under Chinese jurisdiction. That route is explicitly blocked so any time your request gets sent there, it simply fails. China is not a trusted foreign government under US law. And the Chinese government found a novel way to legally spy on the United States and the citizenry are too stupid to prevent it so the government is trying to fix it without calling the public a bunch of idiots like they are.

      • @DonnieDarkmode@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 months ago

        But even if you grant the two premises there, that TikTok’s data collection is beyond that of other apps, and that said data is given to the PRC to access, this draft agreement’s solution to those problems is “let us access that collected data instead of them”. It implements measures that would affect future changes to TOS and policies, but I don’t see anything about scaling back what’s collected now. From what I can tell, this is just trying to replace who’s steering the ship. If the solution that “stops the Chinese government from spying on US citizens” just changes the government that’s doing the spying, I don’t see how that helps said US citizens in any way. The CPC isn’t the one who can put me on a no-fly list on a whim.

        That’s my fundamental issue with this, as well as the relevant proposed legislation; it’s not a good-faith attempt to protect US citizens.

        • pjhenry1216
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          I’m pretty sure access to records doesn’t mean business data. It’s more likely business records. The US government wouldn’t be able to efficiently go through that data anyway. Big Data doesn’t work that way.

          It’s like saying you’re going to copy YouTube videos as they’re uploaded.

      • @veloxy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        Because GitHub has load balances that direct traffic occasionally through a server hosted under Chinese jurisdiction.

        Where the hell did you get that from? Do you have a source for that?

        • pjhenry1216
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The US government as I work for them. The IP in question is blocked for that reason.

          Edit: Slack was also intermittent a few years back due to the same kind of situation. China owns a decent amount of internet infrastructure. It’s fine for normal traffic as TLS and the like, but the US government doesn’t risk it on their administrative or development networks.

      • @wootcrisp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        310 months ago

        And it’s well beyond what any other social media app does plus unnecessary for the functionality of the app.

        I’ll need to rewatch this to remember the specifics, but this privacy YouTuber named Rob Braxman did a comparison of the permissions and terms from Tik Tok and other social media apps, and Tik Tok came out quite favourably: https://youtu.be/VIakTNOhNSE

        Chinese government spying or interference in the algorithm is probably real, but it’s still a far superior product at the end of the day, which tells you something about how bad the competition is. To compare Tik Tok to Instagram reels is completely absurd.

        • pjhenry1216
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          I love that you’re just cool with an oppositional government spying because you like the pretty videos. Please, tell me more intelligent things.

          And please, where did I mention Reels? And what makes it a far superior product behind marketing? What can TikTok do that any other can’t?

    • @can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      and granting yourself the power to do the things you’re afraid China is doing seems appropriately ironic for us.

      I’m so glad to hear some of you are self aware.

  • @PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    810 months ago

    This will destroy what we love about TikTok. The ability to get silenced news stories out that the established press either refuse to report on, or serve to hide or water down the narrative. The train derailment, the Alabama waterfront brawl, news on terrible legislative happenings, the ability to coordinate flashmob style protests.

    They do this, we will NEED a replacement. I refuse to go back to navigating this political landscape blindly.

    • pjhenry1216
      link
      fedilink
      510 months ago

      Ha. TikTok is heavily censored by the Chinese government. It also is a mass data collection beyond any other social media app, well beyond anything that serves the company. Its essentially spying on you. ByteDance is effectively also owned by the Chinese Government. It’s not a privately owned app.

      There is a replacement. You’re probably on most of them. It just won’t be short form video.

    • Franzia
      link
      410 months ago

      Genuinely. The chinese government uses algorithms and active moderation to make sure their tiktok is not nearly as wild as ours.

      • @DonnieDarkmode@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 months ago

        This is missing some pretty important context, in that CPC policy is generally more restrictive around social media and youth usage. This is a country that has legal limits on the amount of time minors can play video games (and I know that’s not unique to China). If you’re making the point, in good faith, that China has identified some specific evil in regards to TikTok, it’s not enough to merely show that they have restrictions on it; you would also need to show how this differs from the way they treat Weibo, bilibili, etc.

        • Franzia
          link
          110 months ago

          My ignorance has been proven! I’m very vaguely aware of all of this.

    • @watson387@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      Dude I’ve never even been on TikTok’s site. I have TikTok blocked with my PiHole and I know about those events. That you believe you can only get these stories on TikTok means you’re playing directly into their hands.

  • taanegl
    link
    fedilink
    810 months ago

    It’s like them saying “listen, we love authoritarian governance. Wanna have some of this TikTok bussy?” And then flaunts it’s ass while winking and throwing kisses. Republicans be all sweaty, losening their ties, licking their lips…

  • @lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    310 months ago

    If you don’t post subversive messages, they won’t be taken down. Get with the program.

      • @lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        This is a warning. This post violates the terms of service and has been taken down. Repeated violations of the terms of service will result in forfeiture of your account.