The National Science Foundation, the federal agency that oversees the U.S. Antarctic Program, published a report in 2022 in which 59% of women said they’d experienced harassment or assault while on the ice, and 72% of women said such behavior was a problem in Antarctica.

But the problem goes beyond the harassment, The Associated Press found. In reviewing court records and internal communications, and in interviews with more than a dozen current and former employees, the AP uncovered a pattern of women who said their claims of harassment or assault were minimized by their employers, often leading to them or others being put in further danger.

    • ComputerSagtNein@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Only possible if you do an all female mission imo.

      All male mission -> they kill each other

      Mixed mission -> they kill the women and probably themselves after

      Edit: Lmao lots of insecure men around here.

          • babeuh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I found this study about the differences (but it’s from 2014, please tell me if you find a more recent one) The Impact of Sex and Gender on Adaptation to Space: Executive Summary.

            TL;DR female astronauts have, according to the study:

            • a higher risk of cancer (a 45-year-old man has a 344-day limit in space to be safe versus a 187-day limit for a 45-year-old woman)
            • more orthostatic intolerance
            • more UTIs (which makes sense as women on earth are also more likely to have UTIs)
            • less vision impairment compared to male astronauts (no clinically significant cases of VIIP syndrome)
            • less hearing problems (men show a more rapid decline in the left ear and in general like on Earth)


            Keep in mind that this data is not the best because only around 20% of people that had been on the ISS at the time were women and because male astronauts are more likely to come from a military background.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              less hearing problems (men show a more rapid decline in the left ear and in general as well)

              Did the study mention why the left ear was more of a problem?

              • babeuh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, here is the relevant paragraph:

                Hearing sensitivity, when measured at most frequencies, declines much more rapidly in male astronauts than it does in female astronauts. These LSAH derived data represent a wide age range of subjects (i.e., four decades) and show a more rapid decline in hearing in the left ear, for men only. Within the general population, hearing also declines more rapidly in men than in women, due in part to environmental factors or occupational exposure (e.g., construction or factory work). No evidence suggests that the sex-based hearing differences in the astronaut population are related to microgravity exposure, and the small sample size of female astronauts precludes making any definitive conclusions.

                • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Thanks. It’s so weird that it affects the left ear of men more. Love to know what makes the left ear more susceptible to damage than the right.

  • xuxebiko@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    1 year ago

    Buckingham was hired by PAE. Amentum didn’t respond to questions from the AP. Leidos Senior Vice President Melissa Lee Dueñas said it conducts background checks on all its employees.

    “Our stance on sexual harassment or assault couldn’t be more clear: we have zero tolerance for such behavior,” Dueñas said in an email. “Each case is thoroughly investigated.”

    Translates to 1) We thoroughly investigate and hire sexual predators and 2) We say this b.s. to protect our jobs, actually we have zero tolerance for those who complain about sexual harassment.

    The report made it clear that those in charge enable sexual predators.

  • Ace0fBlades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    1 year ago

    Makes you wonder what challenges women will face in future space exploration missions. Long periods of isolation with groups of coworkers with very little personal space. Not like a belligerent party can be ejected out the airlock (It’'ll probably happen who am I kidding)

    • rambaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Future missions should be all-women teams. Problem solved.

      Women eat less, use less oxygen, and weigh less than men. There’s actually no logical reason to send male astronauts anywhere.

      Edit: lol @ the downvotes with zero responses

      • Syrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, weight is definitely a more important factor than idk, reaction ability in danger situations or physical resistance to unfriendly environments.

        • Sorrowl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, it is. On a long mission, even a few kg can have big differences in fuel consumption. Also the mean difference of reaction times between men and women is around 20-30ms, which is miniscule. Idk about the differences in resistance to space, but I highly doubt that men are significantly more resistant than women.

          • Syrc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not saying men are better than women in those aspects. I’m saying a very limited amount of people, both men and women, have the physical and mental fortitude to withstand a space mission, and there is virtually never going to be a situation where two people have the exact same qualifications and weight has to be the “tiebreaker”. It’s pretty much a non-factor.

          • cone_zombie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why is 20-30ms “miniscule”, but “a few kgs” compared to the weight of a fucking spacecraft isn’t?

            • Sorrowl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Milliseconds and kilograms are worlds apart in magnitude (e.g. the difference between 1000 seconds (kilosecond… kinda) and 0.001 seconds (1 millisecond)). Secondly, the benefits of having 20 to 30 ms in reaction time is far less than the benefits of having less weight, even though a few kg and a few ms are not really that impactful. Weight directly increases fuel consumption, but reaction time would come into effect, as far as I know, in emergencies. Of course it’s important to have a good reaction time at a time like that, but I’m pretty sure 20-30ms on average slower reactions isn’t going to crash a spaceship. And if it does I would put that to faulty design or bad luck than the crew being 30ms late. Weight, however, would increase the fuel consumption in every step of the way, especially the launch stages. That limits the amount of fuel, components or resources on the ship. Few kg sure aren’t much, but each kg might be a kg away from fuel, food, air or water the ship can handle. That of course depends a bit on the type of mission and spacecraft, as in space each kg affects less than on earth.

          • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would assume a manned mission would have larger tolerances due to the unpredictability of humans and to ensure their safety

      • babeuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There are reasons to do that, women and men react differently to long-term microgravity.

        I found this study about the differences (but it’s from 2014, please tell me if you find a more recent one) The Impact of Sex and Gender on Adaptation to Space: Executive Summary.

        TL;DR female astronauts have, according to the study:

        • a higher risk of cancer (a 45-year-old man has a 344-day limit in space versus a 187-day limit for a 45-year-old woman)
        • more orthostatic intolerance
        • more UTIs (which makes sense as women on earth are also more likely to have UTIs)
        • less vision impairment compared to male astronauts (no clinically significant cases of VIIP syndrome)
        • less hearing problems (men show a more rapid decline in the left ear and in general as well, but this is the case on Earth too)


        Keep in mind that this data is not the best because only around 20% of people that had been on the ISS at the time of the study were women and because male astronauts are more likely to come from a military background.

        I personally think this means we should send an equal amount of both sexes (maybe more women as it would help get more data on the differences). Sending all-men or all-women missions sadly won’t fully solve the problem as sexual assault isn’t always between men and women, that said, it is less common so it’s not a bad idea.

        Anyways, more investigation is required. If you find a newer/better study please tell me (or if something I wrote is inaccurate), I don’t want to spread misinformation

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just FYI that username may get you some hostility. It’s far too close to Ace of Bass which is a band from the 90s that were neo-nazis. The Base of Aces was a Nazi submarine base in WW2. I’m not assuming anything here, the lead singer and guitarist both confirmed separately that was what their band name was referring to, just before they lost all their fans.

  • ghostBones@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had a female friend/coworker that had previously served in the Navy, on a carrier as a communications specialist. She told stories of endless harassment. She said ultimately some of the women crafted partnerships with other female sailors and convinced everyone they were lesbians in order to just survive the job. It meant they had to spend lots of time together and play the part. She also said they had to work the jealousy angle because nobody wanted to be attacked by an angry lesbian girlfriend.

    The male sailors assumed a lot of the women were lesbians because of the masculine nature of the work, or, as she put it, because they couldn’t believe the women weren’t attracted to them. It turned out if you gave them a plausible explanation you could fake your way through it. Without a plausible explanation, they could become resentful and dangerous. I asked if claiming to be married and/or have kids would work, she said it wasn’t as effective and you ultimately needed female allies anyway. She also said that actual lesbians would pretend to “date” hetero women in order to protect them. She kind of described it as leveraging the power of rumors.

    I told her it sounded a lot like what happens in prison. She said in some ways, it was a prison.

  • lasagna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One of them carried a hammer held by her bra. Wild. The person in charge of this place should be facing criminal charges.

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s just stupid, they have ice climbing picks that would hang far more comfortably from a belt. And be easier to reach when needed.

    • SevFTW@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      113
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Men will be men” just excuses the behaviour and ostracizes men who don’t do these things. It has less to do with their sex and more to do with how we raise men.

      Toxic masculinity as a defence mechanism of patriarchal society is the main problem and “feminine”, “emotional” or “weak” men, or those not subscribing to heteronormative sexuality are targeted by the same types to uphold their status.

      • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup. It boils down to power imbalances that are systemic in a world where men still control almost everything.

        I had always hoped we’d move past this but it seems we may not get the chance now (with climate change raging around us).

          • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ofc it’s not all men, but it’s enough men that make everyone’s lives harder. So instead of arguing “not all” maybe focus on the some that are the cause of the problem.

            • Nate Cox@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              I feel like the primary complaint here is that the parent commenters very much want to focus on the some that are the cause of the problem, rather than simply stating that men are problematic.

              • girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yup. If men as a group policed their own there would be a change. But as it stands they don’t seem to want to do that all the time because it’s easier to just let the bad ones slide through.

                • Mardukas@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What’s there to police? It’s not like most aggressors are openly grabbing people in their genitals for all to see. These people know that they are wrong and so they hide it. What am I, as a man against this behaviour, supposed to do about other men?

                • CorruptBuddha@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  If men as a group policed their own there would be a change.

                  This is actually a great idea! To make things simple perhaps we can give these policing men like… some form of identification, like a badge or a uniform so people know who to trust. This is the game changer we needed.

      • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Men will be men is for where men do stupid shit like attach a motor to a merry-go-round and see who can sit on it for the longest or dig holes at the beach because hole.

        It’s sad and sickening to see it be used to try and excuse sexual harassment and assault.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        are targeted by the same types to uphold their status.

        Or sometimes targeted by their mothers. At least this happened to me. I had one long fingernail(on middle finger, you guessed why) and my mother complauned about it almost every day to the point where she came to dad and complained to him. He said “why do you even care?”, but she continued anyway saying “this is not how men do”.

        This happened in post-Soviet society where average family with children is mother+grandmother, so it has nothing to do with “patriarchality” of society. I think it is just manifestation of much broader problems: virtual majority and I can’t translate it, but basicaly “you should do it this way because I said so”.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bro. I’m a man. I have hormones. I also know how to control them.

      “Men will be men” is an unfair generalization.

    • xuxebiko@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      men will apparently just be men.

      this thinking removes the sexual harasser’s & rapist’s responsibility for their crimes and moves it to their gender/DNA.

      When criminal conduct is enabled, crime will escalate.

        • xuxebiko@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes! It absolves men of their responsibility to make their society/community safe and it ensures that if they become a problem then other men will not stop them.

  • vis4valentine@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Being alone in the middle of a literal ice desert with a lot of male nerds so socially awkward that they rather be in the middle of an ice desert sounds like an absolute disaster.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 year ago

      The obvious first thing is comparing stories from different people to see how consistent the accusations are and also to see if there’s anything that can be proven directly (such as recordings, or even things like contradictions within one side’s story, etc)