Police are still searching for a suspect.
Removed by mod
“sanctity of life”
(only applies to fetuses, though)
They don’t even care about the fetus though, it’s just an excuse to oppress women.
Removed by mod
Man these bots reposting from reddit are spreading to the comments, alert the fediverse!
No can do sir, one might start thinking freely
deleted by creator
Probably the people suing over the right to drive drunk as long as you don’t crash into someone and using the fact that most people who drive drunk do not get into accidents should get a portion of the blame.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
The drunk driver, and sometimes the bartender who overserved: https://www.scribd.com/document/627785752/Press-Release-4
What are you implying? That the person isn’t at fault?
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
Don’t forget they are also heavily and continuously regulated to reduce the danger to society whenever possible.
Isn’t it incredible what you can accomplish when you don’t have a self-absorbed death cult insisting they know best?
deleted by creator
Soo who said cars didn’t have a useful purpose?
deleted by creator
Not in many nations. Only here. Wonder why?
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
We had this conversation actually, about a hundred years ago, that’s why you can’t just buy a car at a car show and drive it on public roads without a test, a license, and without following the rules. If Henry Ford fought more vigorously at the time, we wouldn’t have this rules, and then all the excessive deaths would be his fault also. In fact, a lot of the problems with car culture in US can be traced to specific people and companies, and they have a big portion of responsibilities for excessive deaths.
And that’s talking about a car, a car’s primary usage is not a murder. You don’t need to overcome any of those hurdles to obtain and operate a firearm in a lot of cases, and the firearm’s primary purpose is to kill, so it’s even less excusable.deleted by creator
You may not. But many gun owners do. Especially older guns.
deleted by creator
And then we come to the second part of it. Why do you ever need to carry a firearm in public, what purpose can it server in a society, what problem it solves
deleted by creator
Who are you talking to? I’ve seen maybe two conservatives on Lemmy, and they had open minds.
Maybe the poster is talking more generally, not specifically to conservatives on Lemmy?
They’re just, putting the message out there, but it’s posted here because it relates to the subject.
More than 4,000 children and teenagers have been shot this year, according to data published by the Gun Violence Archive (GVA). At least 6,170 children and teenagers were shot in 2022, according to GVA.
Honestly it’s pretty disingenuous to lump children and teenagers together, especially if talking about all the way to 17 or even 19
Removed by mod
I said even if it’s up to 17 it’s misleading. A lot of those 16, 17 year old shooting victims are gang members being shot in shoot outs. Which is a fundamentally different problem from a 9 year old being shot. And lumping those things together does a disservice.
well first you coulda just checked yourself.
second, why? a 16 year old shooting other 16 year olds are children killing, that is still a problem related to guns
A lot
Your whole comment is based on those two words doing a lot.
Good luck trying to convince people kids are in gangs. They won’t listen.
Honestly it’s pretty disingenuous to lump children and teenagers together, especially if talking about all the way to 17 or even 19
Hi, Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz.
Wtf?
Teenagers are still children. They don’t have developed brains. Also take into account that teenagers are growing up more slowly than they did in the past. It is not disingenuous to put them together in the same statistic.
Commenter below mentions that the statistic used is Americans under the age of 18. They are not adults mentally or legally. They are children.
They don’t have developed brains
24 year olds don’t have developed brains either. What’s your point?
It is not disingenuous to put them together in the same statistic.
Absolutely it is
Removed by mod
The data referenced in that quote is linked in the article. When following the link, it specifies “Americans under the age of 18”
Full info: The Gun Violence Archive
Americans under the age of 18 killed or injured by gunfire since 2014:
2014: 2,861
2015: 3,378
2016: 3,820
2017: 3,982
2018: 3,543
2019: 3,825
2020: 5,159
2021: 5,705
2022: 6,170
2023: 4,319 [in 235 days]
Just like quarterly profits the peak of human society aims for a high score every single time. Numbers must go up. ALL NUMBERS must go up. Always. Capitalism is the best.
He doesn’t care. The “they include 19 year olds” is just the talking point he’s been taught when those figures are mentioned, because sometimes they’re described as “children”, rather than “children and teenagers”, which means they can attack the data as misleading.
There’s no concious thought behind it, it’s just trigger and response. That’s why they’ll say the same things even when the data is correctly described.
When they do try and come up with their own excuses, they’re usually terrible. I’ve genuinely had one argue that “17 year olds aren’t teenagers” by claiming that when the word “teenagers” was coined, it was only supposed to mean 13 and 14 year olds and we were somehow being dishonest for using the definition that absolutely everyone in the entire world works with.
But they don’t need their arguments to make sense or their lies about keeping people safe to come true because they intend to drag the conversation out forever.
Unfortunately for them, the kids who grew up among the school shootings will vote one day and they’ll have no issue removing the second amendment entirely.
deleted by creator
The last time I saw a difference between an 18-year-old, a 17-year-old, a 16-year-old, and a child younger than that was when I was 18
So you’re saying a 17 year old is the same as a 9 year old?
Not literally, but they are definitely both children
I love how these brainless talking points from rightwing morons stick out on lemmy. It makes it so easy to know who to block with a single comment.
Because there can’t possibly be left wing people who would rather not cede our guns to the government. Nope. Must be right wing
Regardless of whether you are left or right leaning, the talking point is a rightwing baby.
How does trying to prattle on about not liking grouping 17 year olds together with 9 year olds a pro-gun argument? That would only even vaguely make sense if your stance was “yeah, but 17 year olds deserve to get shot and killed”
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
“17 year olds are old enough to die to gun violence”.
“17 year old gang members killing each other is a different problem from 9 year olds being shot and shouldn’t be lumped together”. Crazy, right?
Oh I understand now, you think the 17 year olds don’t count because they’re black. Here I was thinking you were reprehensible.
I guess you haven’t looked into how many of those 17 year old statistics took their fathers poorly secured gun (that was for “keeping his family safe” of course) and blew their brains out in the living room.
Let’s hope the poor innocent gun didn’t get scuffed or scratched when it fell to the floor since it’s clear what was more important.
I wonder how many of them used to be “responsible gun owners” who taught their children to “treat guns with respect”, not knowing they were teaching their kid how to load and fire the round that would kill them?
Oh well, I’m sure it will never happen to you and I’m sure those fathers never thought it would never happen to them.
Oh I understand now, you think the 17 year olds don’t count because they’re black
Lol wtf? What the shit are you talking about?
There’s no need to be coy – even the most deeply stupid Americans know what terms like “gang members”, “thugs” and “urban crime” are innuendo for, because deeply stupid Americans are the target demographic.
If you want to get upset at people saying it out loud, you’re going to have to dig up Lee Atwater and throw a tantrum at his rotting, cancerous corpse.
This is probably the stupidest comment I’ve ever read. Are you suggesting it’s impossible to talk about gangs without it being racist?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Land of the free, as long as you only measure freedom in semi-automatic weapons.
I think it’s time to change the American National Anthem to “Another One Bites the Dust”.
America: Only thing less valuable than the lives of our kids are the lives of foreign kids!
Excuse me… we don’t say foreign kids around here… we prefer the term “future veterans of america” thank you very much
More than 4,000 children and teenagers have been shot this year, according to data published by the Gun Violence Archive (GVA). At least 6,170 children and teenagers were shot in 2022, according to GVA.
https://nitter.net/GunDeaths/status/1686388657488572416#m
Can we actually expect 2100 more children to receive a gunshot wound this year?
good house with a gun could’ve prevented this
That’s utter fucking ridiculous!
The 12 year old should have had a gun so she could’ve shot the incoming bullet.
Florida is really not having a good go of things. Christ
This just happened in Jacksonville:
This was a hateful and insane racist, I suspect the intentions of this shooting above to be less extreme.
Removed by mod
I thought so too, but he had been involuntarily held for mental health crisis for likely just a few days when he was 15, and he wrote a massive fucking manifesto. Stochastic terrorism is real, but I think in that case it affected someone who had screws loose.
Removed by mod
Okay, so what gun laws are we changing so that “hateful racists with screws loose” can’t maximize their violence with minimal effort?
Because if you look back through the parade of mass shooters, the overwhelming majority had both clear warning signs and legal firearms.
