• empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Their achieved accuracy was +/- 1.5km and +/- 2m/s

    Which is an improvement in of itself. That improves flying craft navigation to and from the moon into something significantly easier to automate and coordinate between multiple ships, more than ballistic dead reckoning.

    • britaliope@kourjetez.bzh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      is it really such a huge deal ? Afaik “ballistic dead rekoning” is really, really accurate and isnt difficult to automate (it’s mostly math after all)

      • itslilith
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        For longer missions it helps to be able to re-calibrate, as with dead-reckoning, the errors cumulate

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Better than ballistic dead reckoning, yes. I’m not sure whether it is better or worse than star trackers plus inertial navigation units at that time scale (INUs drift over time and need to be recalibrated every so often to fix that drift, but I really don’t know how accurate star trackers are for position since I only use them for attitude measurement).