• unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    but failed to even mention the issues of workplace culture and absurd quotas.

    For my own understanding, was there something that was missing in their content reforms/error handling and workplace culture segments? I think they had mentioned a commitment to reducing frequency, which I understand is a solution to those, no?

    • threethan@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was mistaken - they did say they would “reduce output.” However, they said nothing about how, how much, or what that would mean.

      They also heavily implied that they were not overworking people, despite that clearly and evidently being a real issue.

      It’s exceptionally difficult to address this sort of deep-seated issue, but they needed to acknowledge specific wrongdoing, and take concrete action to improve, as they did with the accuracy issue.

      • unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes that’s true, but I do empathize with the difficulty of the situation, as a manager. A week is practically equivalent to a flash of time in normal business circumstances… Under normal circumstances, that is barely enough time to begin talking about issues, nevermind rolling out plans… I’m even shocked Linus announced a plan to begin with. I was fully expecting a vid to simply call out observations. And this to me demonstrates his commitment and dedication to the community.

        So, as much as I’ve been critical of LMG in the past, I would probably give them the time to allow those details (how, how much, what it means) to organically surface over time. Otherwise, that demand is probably what unintentionally pressures LMG to have the output speed they have, because they want to satisfy the community.