• Treble
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seems the problem is beyond finding a ‘cure-all’. Multiple strategies will be necessary.

        • Treble
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          …which somehow doesn’t include producing less garbage?

            • Treble
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              An individual abstaining from owning slaves didn’t reduce slave populations either. Think they were as dumb and ineffectual as I am? Fine.

              • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                so you are moving the goalposts from efficacy to ethics. that’s fine, but I don’t believe eating fish is unethical.

                • Treble
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Multitudes of alternatives (plants!) are less cruel and harmful to our planet. Do you disagree?

                  • NSRXN@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I don’t think eating fish is cruel, nor inherently harmful to the planet. the methods of fishing that have developed, and the scale of modern fishing are problems, but for me to choose to abstain from fish would not mitigate the situation.