Philippa Foot is most known for her invention of the Trolley Problem thought experiment in the 1960s. A lesser known variation of hers is as follows:

Suppose that a judge is faced with rioters demanding that a culprit be found for a certain crime. The rioters are threatening to take bloody revenge on a particular section of the community. The real culprit being unknown, the judge sees himself as able to prevent the bloodshed from the riots only by framing some innocent person and having them executed.

These are the only two options: execute an innocent person for a crime they did not commit, or let people riot in the streets knowing there will be loss of life. If you were the judge, what would you do?

  • gravalicious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let them riot. They’ll commit crimes and be tried for their actions. The judge choosing an innocent scapegoat doesn’t resolve the issue. Even if appeased, the rioters will want to riot again.

    Hold people accountable for their actions instead of their words.