I wasn’t referring to the article, I was referring to what Senate Democrats can do in the current situation. At bare minimum, that can do what they were elected for as the opposition party. We don’t get even a noteworthy fraction of that, let alone extralegal measures.
If the law only applies to some people and not the others, it’s not a good law. If the law selective doesn’t apply if you want to hurt other people, it’s your moral duty to ignore it and deal with the problem.
The article is about Trump ignoring the law. How do they change that by doing the things you listed?
I wasn’t referring to the article, I was referring to what Senate Democrats can do in the current situation. At bare minimum, that can do what they were elected for as the opposition party. We don’t get even a noteworthy fraction of that, let alone extralegal measures.
As a party, democrats have voted against all of Trumps cabinet picks.
Blaming “Senate Democrats” for the votes of outliers like Fetterman who vote against party lines is disingenuous.
If the law only applies to some people and not the others, it’s not a good law. If the law selective doesn’t apply if you want to hurt other people, it’s your moral duty to ignore it and deal with the problem.