Republicans on the House Small Business Committee pressed Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm on Thursday for answers on proposed energy-efficiency standards for ceiling fans.

The proposed standards were first published in the Federal Register in June, and the comment period closed earlier this week. According to the Energy Department, the rule as applied to standard residential ceiling fans would cut fan-related electricity costs by about 40 percent relative to the least efficient fans currently available.

The House panel presented the rules as burdensome to ceiling fan manufacturers, particularly smaller ones.

“This proposed rule would decrease the maximum estimated energy consumption permissible for large diameter and belt driven ceiling fans,” committee Republicans wrote. “This rule would require numerous small business fan manufacturers to redesign their products and may put between 10 and 30 percent of small business ceiling fan manufacturers out of business. It appears that the Department of Energy may not have properly considered small entities during this rulemaking process.”

An Energy Department spokesperson told The Hill this aspect has been mischaracterized, saying in an email that the one-time total conversion cost would be about $107 million for all manufacturers.

“The incremental cost to consumers is $86.6 million annually, while the operating cost savings are $281 million annually — both at a 7 percent discount rate,” the spokesperson said. “The savings are more than triple the incremental costs.”

The spokesperson noted the standards, “which are required by Congress,” would not be in effect for five years and would save Americans “up to $369 million per year, while substantially reducing harmful air pollution — a crucial fact that some have conveniently failed to mention.”

Efficiency standards for home appliances have become culture war flashpoints under the Biden administration. The administration has restored a number of efficiency rules rolled back under the Trump administration, including for shower heads, water heaters and gas furnaces.

The most umbrage, however, has been reserved for efficiency regulations over gas stoves, beginning last year when Consumer Product Safety Commissioner Richard Trumka Jr. approved a request for information on hazards associated with the devices, which the CPSC formalized in March. Although Trumka has said there are no plans to ban gas stoves, House Republicans have introduced formal legislation this year to legally prevent such a ban.

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    From selling them to home remodelers and knowing that people will go to great lengths to maintain a specific style of decor.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      If only those manufacturers were somehow able to redesign their products to meet the new requirements.

      Oh well, I guess they’ll just go under.

    • techt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      So the idea is the fan’s function is largely encompassed by the other infrastructure – central air or heat pump, say – but they keep it there anyway because it looks nice? Alright, to each their own

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          We just installed a ceiling fan in the bedroom… It wasn’t because of decor, but rather because you can sit in a room at 80 degrees with a fan on pretty comfortably. Without the fan and it’s a miserable experience. This alone has significantly cut our AC usage.

          • roguetrick@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You’re preaching to the choir. I haven’t used AC all summer in the mid Atlantic. Even a poor fan will circulate cold air higher and hot air lower off you are using climate controls.