They’ve decided to incorporate ChatGPT.

  • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Not phrasing your queries as a question makes it more likely you will find what you are looking for in a traditional search

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, this seems like a really stupid gripe. You can completely disable it for your searches: https://i.xno.dev/FUHSj.png

    In addition, it gives you a way to interface with ChatGPT without an account, or using the API, and maintaining privacy… I see this as an absolute win. They stay competitive by including AI for people who can’t live without, while making it completely optional. Offering duck.ai is a smart move, too. I just don’t see the issue here.

    • AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Defaults matter. Every time you open a private browsing window, that’s what you’re going to get. Every time you use LibreWolf or Firefox Focus or any other browser that disables/clears cookies by default (which is a good practice), that’s what you’re going to get.

      I don’t want anything I search for going into OpenAI. Ever. I’d feel fine about this if they hosted their own models.

      • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        22 hours ago

        This. I fucking hate that it’s opt out. Every goddamn time I open Firefox and run a search I gotta disable the stupid AI bullshit.

        • criitz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          I don’t think it AI’s your search immediately. It just shows you the option to generate an AI response. At least that’s how it’s been working for me. It’s not doing anything unless you hit that button.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            It’s been hit and miss for me. It feels like there’s some cached queries that it presents the AI results for without user interaction. But it’s very clearly marked.

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Like, sure. That’s a valid argument. But it’s not the end of the goddamn world because they make you click a button to use a completely free service.

        If you’re that pissed about it, then setup SearX yourself. Not sure why every “technologist” feels like their opinion is the only that matters and gets butthurt about shit like this.

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I use it if I do not have my own server running. There are many times I am looking for a word or info that is not very compatible with a search engine but is effective for AI.

      I think there are a lot of people that just do not understand AI, and how to use it effectively. There seems to be a user filter where low Machiavellian individuals with poor abstractive thinking skills struggle to understand the subjective nature of the world in every space and how all of our collective incorrectness is present in AI too.

      Perhaps they only played with very small models of the Llama 2 era, which were much harder to effectively use. Or maybe they played with llama.cpp before April of last year when the special tokens were incorrectly defaulted to GPT2 tokens for all models in the first ~260 positions.

      I forget the name of the issue, but seem to recall there is some kind of unsolved database indexing paradox that is why search engines suck now, but that is a vague memory. Likely AI is just the whipping boy for people that are getting left behind by technology they are unable to learn effectively.

  • cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    On second thought, maybe they’re doing the right thing. Offering what the competition does with improved privacy and the option to switch it off completely. I personally think LLMs are pretty bad at real-life queries, but ultimately the users will have to decide.

    • Flagstaff@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      They’ve helped me figure out some nested spreadsheet formulas that were pretty complicated to me.

      What typically happens is that they mess up, but their malfunctioning code still has something in it that I hadn’t considered, which leads me in the right direction. They have their place in terms of helpfulness when you can’t or don’t want to wait for someone.

  • threesigma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “Educational purposes”… because everyone knows it’s good educational practice to spout utter bullshit at people wanting information.

  • Jack@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Am I the only one noticably receiving more adds on duck duck go last few days/week?

    I feel like the adds and the AI response thing make it much worse.

    Have to scroll a whole screen untill I see a organic result.

  • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I use ducks AI chat to help me with small tasks and its honestly pretty great. Always worked and has provided me with useful results.

    They claim its anonymous, maybe they are lying, maybe they are not. I make sure to rinse anything I put in there first just in case.

    • XTL@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I think searx is using POST or something, which means you can’t bookmark searches, they’re broken in history, and if when you restart a browser, your search tabs get completely lost.

      It’s been the worst search UI I’ve seen in the nearly 30 years I’ve used web searches.

      Still use it, because of the alternatives.

  • cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m open for alternative suggestions. The ease of wiping browser data while excluding preferred sites in duckduckgo is really nice.