Summary

Twenty-one staffers from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) resigned, citing ethical concerns over dismantling public services and compromising sensitive data.

Formerly part of the U.S. Digital Service, they criticized Musk and Trump’s overhaul, which included layoffs and politically charged interviews.

Their letter warned that removing skilled technologists endangers essential services like Social Security and veterans’ benefits.

The resignations add to growing concerns over Musk’s aggressive federal cuts, amplified by his recent CPAC speech where he symbolically wielded a chainsaw against “bureaucracy.”

  • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I am always confused why they don’t just sabotage the efforts? Like it would be so easy and they definitely aren’t paying attention…

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      15 hours ago

      One aspect is that working in that kind of system destroys your mental health. Having to play games to hide the good things, trying to mitigate the bad things. It’s pressure.

      My state has been basically been doing Project 2025 for the past five years. I had a friend in an important position in a fascist overtaken state organization who held on for a long time, fighting the good fight - but it drains. She fought her fucking hardest, but a human being can only fight for so long.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      117
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Different people are able to take on different levels of risk.

      Just because these people resigned doesn’t mean that some other people aren’t staying in for the purposes of being subversive, and you shouldn’t ever hear about the latter.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Sabatoge can carry extremely harsh legal penalties, particularly if it has any type of lasting impact. Beyond that, just phoning it in and doing a bad job can slow things down but doesn’t actually stop it. If you’re then let go it’s on their pace, it looks worse for you and it’s less noticeable.

      A mass resignation can be the only thing some people can do. It sends a message, it gets noticed outside the organization, and it lets objective news reporting share your motivation, which would normally fall under opinion.
      It also leaves a big gap in the organization that isn’t getting anything done.

      • bufalo1973@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Not if you make an Italian strike. You are following every single step of the process, taking the time needed, all by the book. And when the higher rank says something then everyone working resigns all at once.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Guys, dumping tea in the harbor is illegal, just pay your taxes to the crown. It’s just a king, everyone has one

          • RippleEffect@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The American revolutionary war was difficult enough with an entire ocean separating us from a king. Now the self appointed king is here.

      • DrFistington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Lol getting fired doesn’t look bad. It doesn’t look like anything because you aren’t legally required to tell a future employer if you were fired, and they can’t ask the previous employer

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’m pretty sure any future employee that saw you were fired after Trump took power (because you didn’t express loyalty to a fascist) would see this as a good thing.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          18 hours ago

          It’s public information if a government employee is terminated, and there’s nothing stopping them from reaching out to the previous employer.

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 hours ago

              And do you think that that prevents them from disclosing that they terminated an employee for unprofessional conduct or unsatisfactory job performance?

              Further, for government employees certain details about their jobs are simply considered matters of public record. It’s not something they divulge, it was simply never private in the first place.