• selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So, are they already taking Crimea back, after regaining Luhansk and Donetsk? Because that’s what “starting to win” means. Oh, the kyivpost…

    • Hubi@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      In what world is “total victory” equivalent to “starting to win”?

      • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The main, possibly only, glimmer of hope in the article was “assets in and outside Russia had strong evidence that Russian arms production during 2025 has flatlined and is likely to contract, because of parts and labor shortages,” and Russia is drafting 100,000 fewer men than last year. That seems well short of “starting to win,” unfortunately. Ukraine also appears to be losing 1/3 of their military support if what Zelensky said in the article is true. Did I miss something?

        • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          The Russia was able to barely retain the size of its forces when its losses were 800 to 1200 per day. Now they are 1300 to 1900 per day, and its ability to recruit new troops has not risen and it seems it may have even decreased.

          That means, the size of the Russian armed forces is decreasing by 500 to 700 soldiers each day! In a year that makes 180 000 to 255 000 soldiers per year. When their army shrinks in size with about 200 000 soldiers per year, they’re very soon going to have plenty of “fun” trying to defend all of their front.